Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1037/hop0000267
Sedef Ozoguz
Liberation is a multifaceted concept, often intertwined with psychological processes such as freedom from oppression and the ability to think and act freely. Historically, Western social psychologists have favored the individualistic notion of freedom over the collective effort of liberation. This divergence has led to the separation of the histories of liberation struggles and psychology, including feminism. This article explores distinct historical trajectories in Turkey and highlights the divisive dynamics within feminist movements, particularly the erasure of ethnic minority women by state feminists in postdynastic Turkey. Furthermore, the Westernization and the Americanization of psychology have positioned the field as a neutral, value-free science, effectively silencing indigenous feminist perspectives and encouraging overreliance on adapting gender-based scales to Turkish. Despite this, a nascent history of feminist psychology in Turkey exists, which challenges homogenization and standardization, advocating for a conceptualization of freedom beyond individualism. Finally, an agenda for liberating social psychology is proposed through challenging tattered binaries of "East" and "West" or "secular" or "conservative" and promoting a collective and intersectional approach to psychological research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
解放是一个多层面的概念,通常与摆脱压迫、自由思考和行动的能力等心理过程交织在一起。从历史上看,西方社会心理学家更倾向于个人主义的自由概念,而不是集体努力的解放。这种分歧导致了解放斗争史与心理学(包括女权主义)的分离。本文探讨了土耳其独特的历史轨迹,强调了女权运动内部的分裂动态,尤其是后王朝时期土耳其国家女权主义者对少数民族妇女的抹杀。此外,心理学的西方化和美国化将该领域定位为一门中立、无价值的科学,有效地压制了本土女权主义观点,并鼓励过度依赖将基于性别的尺度调整为土耳其语。尽管如此,土耳其的女性主义心理学仍有一段新生的历史,它对同质化和标准化提出了挑战,倡导超越个人主义的自由概念。最后,通过挑战 "东方 "和 "西方 "或 "世俗 "或 "保守 "等破旧的二元对立,以及促进以集体和交叉的方式开展心理学研究和实践,提出了解放社会心理学的议程。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"The Westernization of social and personality psychology in Turkey and the ongoing struggle for indigenous perspectives: A historical review and an agenda for liberating psychology.","authors":"Sedef Ozoguz","doi":"10.1037/hop0000267","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liberation is a multifaceted concept, often intertwined with psychological processes such as freedom from oppression and the ability to think and act freely. Historically, Western social psychologists have favored the individualistic notion of freedom over the collective effort of liberation. This divergence has led to the separation of the histories of liberation struggles and psychology, including feminism. This article explores distinct historical trajectories in Turkey and highlights the divisive dynamics within feminist movements, particularly the erasure of ethnic minority women by state feminists in postdynastic Turkey. Furthermore, the Westernization and the Americanization of psychology have positioned the field as a neutral, value-free science, effectively silencing indigenous feminist perspectives and encouraging overreliance on adapting gender-based scales to Turkish. Despite this, a nascent history of feminist psychology in Turkey exists, which challenges homogenization and standardization, advocating for a conceptualization of freedom beyond individualism. Finally, an agenda for liberating social psychology is proposed through challenging tattered binaries of \"East\" and \"West\" or \"secular\" or \"conservative\" and promoting a collective and intersectional approach to psychological research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Nicole Oré-Kovacs, Walter L Arias Gallegos
This brief communication commemorates the 100th anniversary of the birth of Reynaldo Alarcón Napurí and briefly reviews his contributions to the history of psychology in Peru and Latin America. Alarcón academic career spanned over seven decades and encompassed multiple research interests, one of which was the history of psychology. It is concluded that his historiographical work, as a whole, marked a significant milestone that has served as a reference point for delving into various aspects of the history of Peruvian psychology as both a science and a profession. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇简短的通讯是为了纪念雷纳尔多Alarcón Napurí诞辰100周年,并简要回顾了他对秘鲁和拉丁美洲心理学史的贡献。Alarcón他的学术生涯跨越了70多年,涉及多个研究领域,其中之一就是心理学史。结论是,他的史学工作,作为一个整体,标志着一个重要的里程碑,作为一个参考点,深入研究秘鲁心理学的历史的各个方面,作为一门科学和专业。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Reynaldo Alarcón Napurí: 100 years of the pioneer of historical studies of psychology in Peru.","authors":"Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Nicole Oré-Kovacs, Walter L Arias Gallegos","doi":"10.1037/hop0000272","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This brief communication commemorates the 100th anniversary of the birth of Reynaldo Alarcón Napurí and briefly reviews his contributions to the history of psychology in Peru and Latin America. Alarcón academic career spanned over seven decades and encompassed multiple research interests, one of which was the history of psychology. It is concluded that his historiographical work, as a whole, marked a significant milestone that has served as a reference point for delving into various aspects of the history of Peruvian psychology as both a science and a profession. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"68-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143391901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Legal evaluation of criminal responsibility has a long and controversial history that has trended toward greater considerations of defendants' intelligence and other psychological factors. The authors examine a 1928 criminal case that illustrates legal intelligence assessments and expert psychological testimony related to the insanity defense in the United States at that time. James Deacons, a 15-year-old with a cognitive disability, provided multiple coerced and contaminated confessions to homicide and sexual assault. The judge then sought mental health and intelligence assessments of Deacons to evaluate the potential for an insanity defense or other consideration of Deacons' intelligence that could lead to treatment rather than prison. The authors review the biography of the experienced intelligence assessor, Eugene C. Rowe. The authors consider Rowe's preassessment biases, including eugenic biases and other proguilt biases, before examining Rowe's multiple violations of protocol. These violations inflated Deacons' intelligence test score and eliminated legal consideration of Deacons' intelligence; Deacons then pleaded guilty. The authors contrast the evaluation of Deacons with H. H. Goddard's (1914) evaluation of Jean Gianini, including distinct outcomes. The authors connect this case to the larger histories of the insanity defense, expert testimony by psychologists, and perceptions of people with low intelligence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
刑事责任的法律评估有着悠久而有争议的历史,倾向于更多地考虑被告的智力和其他心理因素。作者研究了1928年的一个刑事案件,该案件说明了当时美国与精神错乱辩护有关的法律情报评估和专家心理证词。15岁的詹姆斯·迪肯斯(James Deacons)患有认知障碍,他对杀人和性侵犯进行了多次胁迫和污染供述。然后,法官要求对执事进行心理健康和智力评估,以评估精神错乱辩护的可能性,或对执事智力的其他考虑,这些考虑可能导致治疗而不是监禁。作者回顾了经验丰富的情报评估员尤金·c·罗的传记。作者考虑了Rowe的预评估偏见,包括优生偏见和其他有罪倾向偏见,然后检查了Rowe的多次违反协议。这些违规行为抬高了执事的智力测试分数,并消除了对执事智力的法律考虑;执事们随后认罪。作者将Deacons的评价与h.h. Goddard(1914)对Jean Gianini的评价进行了对比,包括不同的结果。作者将这个案例与精神错乱辩护的更大历史、心理学家的专家证词以及对低智商人群的看法联系起来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"From coerced confessions to biased assessments: Lessons from 1928.","authors":"Austin D Hamilton, William Douglas Woody","doi":"10.1037/hop0000270","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Legal evaluation of criminal responsibility has a long and controversial history that has trended toward greater considerations of defendants' intelligence and other psychological factors. The authors examine a 1928 criminal case that illustrates legal intelligence assessments and expert psychological testimony related to the insanity defense in the United States at that time. James Deacons, a 15-year-old with a cognitive disability, provided multiple coerced and contaminated confessions to homicide and sexual assault. The judge then sought mental health and intelligence assessments of Deacons to evaluate the potential for an insanity defense or other consideration of Deacons' intelligence that could lead to treatment rather than prison. The authors review the biography of the experienced intelligence assessor, Eugene C. Rowe. The authors consider Rowe's preassessment biases, including eugenic biases and other proguilt biases, before examining Rowe's multiple violations of protocol. These violations inflated Deacons' intelligence test score and eliminated legal consideration of Deacons' intelligence; Deacons then pleaded guilty. The authors contrast the evaluation of Deacons with H. H. Goddard's (1914) evaluation of Jean Gianini, including distinct outcomes. The authors connect this case to the larger histories of the insanity defense, expert testimony by psychologists, and perceptions of people with low intelligence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"46-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143391982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1037/hop0000269
Trevor G Bond, Anastasia Tryphon
Bärbel Inhelder's name is almost inseparable from that of Jean Piaget. She has contributed largely to the Genevan school of psychology, and particularly to its only tome on adolescence, The Growth of Logical Thinking. What is less well-known is that the protocols used in that text came directly from Inhelder's personal research project on inductive reasoning. As well as working with Piaget, Inhelder actively pursued her own research interests, that is, the development of experimental methods in adolescents, aiming at publishing her own volume on the topic. However, that book-Inhelder's unfinished symphony-was rediscovered as a manuscript after her death and has never appeared. The search for documents to contextualize this omission inevitably focuses on Inhelder's working conditions and the social context in Geneva during that period and proposes some possible explanations for the missing publication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Bärbel Inhelder的名字和Jean Piaget的名字几乎是分不开的。她为日内瓦心理学学派做出了巨大贡献,尤其是该学派唯一一本关于青少年的巨著《逻辑思维的成长》。不太为人所知的是,该文本中使用的协议直接来自Inhelder对归纳推理的个人研究项目。在与皮亚杰合作的同时,Inhelder积极追求自己的研究兴趣,即发展青少年实验方法,旨在就此主题出版自己的著作。然而,那本书——因海尔德未完成的交响曲——在她死后被作为手稿重新发现,从未出现过。寻找文件来说明这一遗漏不可避免地集中在Inhelder在这一时期的工作条件和日内瓦的社会背景上,并为丢失的出版物提出了一些可能的解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The experimental method of adolescents: Bärbel Inhelder's unfinished symphony.","authors":"Trevor G Bond, Anastasia Tryphon","doi":"10.1037/hop0000269","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bärbel Inhelder's name is almost inseparable from that of Jean Piaget. She has contributed largely to the Genevan school of psychology, and particularly to its only tome on adolescence, <i>The Growth of Logical Thinking</i>. What is less well-known is that the protocols used in that text came directly from Inhelder's personal research project on inductive reasoning. As well as working with Piaget, Inhelder actively pursued her own research interests, that is, the development of experimental methods in adolescents, aiming at publishing her own volume on the topic. However, that book-Inhelder's unfinished symphony-was rediscovered as a manuscript after her death and has never appeared. The search for documents to contextualize this omission inevitably focuses on Inhelder's working conditions and the social context in Geneva during that period and proposes some possible explanations for the missing publication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143392064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1037/hop0000263
Matthew Perkins-McVey
Sigmund Freud's pioneering early work on individuated nerve cells, later termed "neurons," has long been recognized by the history of psychology. Yet, relatively little has been written about the influence of Freud's then mentor, Theodor Meynert, on Freud's 1884-1885 neuroanatomical research, or the monumental conceptual shift embodied in the project itself. Focusing on Freud's 1884 "Die Struktur der Elemente des Nervensytems" (The Structure of the Elements of the Nervous System) as his first true effort to describe individuated nerve cells, this article identifies Meynert as highly influential on Freud's turn to representative schema, further suggesting that Freud's brief foray in clinical neurology at Meynert's clinic aligns with Freud's move from the laboratory to the mind. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
西格蒙德-弗洛伊德早期关于单个神经细胞(后被称为 "神经元")的开创性工作早已为心理学史所公认。然而,关于弗洛伊德当时的导师西奥多-梅纳特(Theodor Meynert)对弗洛伊德 1884-1885 年神经解剖学研究的影响,以及该项目本身所体现的巨大概念转变,却鲜有论述。这篇文章以弗洛伊德 1884 年发表的《神经系统要素的结构》(Die Struktur der Elemente des Nervensytems)为重点,认为这是他第一次真正努力描述独立的神经细胞,并指出梅纳特对弗洛伊德转向代表性模式具有重大影响,同时进一步指出,弗洛伊德在梅纳特诊所短暂涉足临床神经学研究与弗洛伊德从实验室走向心灵的过程是一致的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Cortical localization and the nerve cell: Freud's work in Meynert's psychiatry clinic.","authors":"Matthew Perkins-McVey","doi":"10.1037/hop0000263","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sigmund Freud's pioneering early work on individuated nerve cells, later termed \"neurons,\" has long been recognized by the history of psychology. Yet, relatively little has been written about the influence of Freud's then mentor, Theodor Meynert, on Freud's 1884-1885 neuroanatomical research, or the monumental conceptual shift embodied in the project itself. Focusing on Freud's 1884 \"Die Struktur der Elemente des Nervensytems\" (The Structure of the Elements of the Nervous System) as his first true effort to describe individuated nerve cells, this article identifies Meynert as highly influential on Freud's turn to representative schema, further suggesting that Freud's brief foray in clinical neurology at Meynert's clinic aligns with Freud's move from the laboratory to the mind. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"333-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-06-06DOI: 10.1037/hop0000260
Pauline Mercier, Nikos Kalampalikis
We have tried to retrace the contributions and dissemination of the work of the famous British psychologist F. C. Bartlett through various authors who have been inspired by his work, to a greater or lesser extent. To investigate these questions, we have chosen to carry out a bibliometric work. We were interested in the scientific articles available via the electronic library services (offered by the university and via Google Scholar). The only criterion that guided us in the inclusion in the corpus was the explicit nominative reference to Frederic Charles Bartlett on the whole article. The corpus collected (n = 731) concerns a period of almost a century (1920-2019). The results reveal two periods of increased publication, in 1985 (n = 20) and 2019 (n = 137). Nevertheless, while the name of the author is increasingly cited, most of the time it is only once in the body of the articles. A form of scientific automatism manifests itself in the form of a brief, systematic and automatic citation of the first edition of only one of his books. This "mystified" usage may well extend beyond this author, since Lewin is subject to the same stereotypical quotations and paradoxical marginalization in French-language social psychology textbooks (Pétard et al., 2001). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们试图通过或多或少受到英国著名心理学家 F. C. 巴特利特作品启发的不同作者,追溯其作品的贡献和传播情况。为了研究这些问题,我们选择了文献计量学方法。我们感兴趣的是通过电子图书馆服务(由大学提供并通过谷歌学术)获得的科学文章。将弗雷德里克-查尔斯-巴特利特(Frederic Charles Bartlett)列入语料库的唯一标准是整篇文章中明确提到他的名字。所收集的语料(n = 731)涉及近一个世纪(1920-2019 年)。结果显示,1985 年(n = 20)和 2019 年(n = 137)是文章发表量增加的两个时期。然而,虽然作者姓名被引用的次数越来越多,但大多数情况下,作者姓名在文章正文中只出现过一次。一种科学自动化的表现形式是,只简短、系统和自动地引用了作者一本著作的初版。这种 "神秘化 "的用法很可能超出了这位作者的范围,因为在法语社会心理学教科书中,卢因也受到了同样的刻板引用和自相矛盾的边缘化(Pétard et al.)(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The totemic use of an author in psychology: A century of publications of the work of F. C. Bartlett.","authors":"Pauline Mercier, Nikos Kalampalikis","doi":"10.1037/hop0000260","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have tried to retrace the contributions and dissemination of the work of the famous British psychologist F. C. Bartlett through various authors who have been inspired by his work, to a greater or lesser extent. To investigate these questions, we have chosen to carry out a bibliometric work. We were interested in the scientific articles available via the electronic library services (offered by the university and via Google Scholar). The only criterion that guided us in the inclusion in the corpus was the explicit nominative reference to Frederic Charles Bartlett on the whole article. The corpus collected (<i>n</i> = 731) concerns a period of almost a century (1920-2019). The results reveal two periods of increased publication, in 1985 (<i>n</i> = 20) and 2019 (<i>n</i> = 137). Nevertheless, while the name of the author is increasingly cited, most of the time it is only once in the body of the articles. A form of scientific automatism manifests itself in the form of a brief, systematic and automatic citation of the first edition of only one of his books. This \"mystified\" usage may well extend beyond this author, since Lewin is subject to the same stereotypical quotations and paradoxical marginalization in French-language social psychology textbooks (Pétard et al., 2001). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"297-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141262912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1037/hop0000261
Marc J Ratcliff
The problems addressed in this article are the transition from the Piagetian clinical method to the so-called critical method, that is, the use of objects manipulated by both the experimenter and the child, and the study of the role of Piaget's female collaborators--in particular Alina Szeminska and Bärbel Inhelder--in the establishment of the critical method. Several authors suggested that Inhelder was behind certain Piagetian experimental devices and the critical method. To evaluate this thesis, we used segment analysis, dealing with the isolable, relevant, and necessary parts of an experiment. Intensive research into Piaget's research data and publications from the 1920s, compared with the early publications of Szeminska and Inhelder, showed that it was Piaget who, as early as 1922, made the transition from the clinical to the critical method and invented a number of experimental setups, including those attributed to Inhelder. On the other hand, Szeminska appeared as the creator of her experimental design. To interpret this situation, we used the concept of research culture and the focus shifted from priority issues to methodological and social practices: Piaget's students had to appropriate his research culture, a "system of methods" in a dynamic relationship. This enabled their inclusion into his research programs by learning to create new devices and thus become autonomous disciples. Piaget adopted a strategy of generosity, making available to his students research directions that he had already dealt with, on which they specialized and which he had given priority, thus helping them in their careers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Jean Piaget and the autonomous disciples, Alina Szeminska and Bärbel Inhelder: From the \"critical method\" to the appropriation of research culture.","authors":"Marc J Ratcliff","doi":"10.1037/hop0000261","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The problems addressed in this article are the transition from the Piagetian clinical method to the so-called critical method, that is, the use of objects manipulated by both the experimenter and the child, and the study of the role of Piaget's female collaborators--in particular Alina Szeminska and Bärbel Inhelder--in the establishment of the critical method. Several authors suggested that Inhelder was behind certain Piagetian experimental devices and the critical method. To evaluate this thesis, we used segment analysis, dealing with the isolable, relevant, and necessary parts of an experiment. Intensive research into Piaget's research data and publications from the 1920s, compared with the early publications of Szeminska and Inhelder, showed that it was Piaget who, as early as 1922, made the transition from the clinical to the critical method and invented a number of experimental setups, including those attributed to Inhelder. On the other hand, Szeminska appeared as the creator of her experimental design. To interpret this situation, we used the concept of research culture and the focus shifted from priority issues to methodological and social practices: Piaget's students had to appropriate his research culture, a \"system of methods\" in a dynamic relationship. This enabled their inclusion into his research programs by learning to create new devices and thus become autonomous disciples. Piaget adopted a strategy of generosity, making available to his students research directions that he had already dealt with, on which they specialized and which he had given priority, thus helping them in their careers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"317-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1037/hop0000264
Michael J Zickar
Dr. Katherine Blackford's writings on physiognomy-based character analysis were popular in the business community during the period roughly from 1914 to 1925. I document the rise of the Blackford System of character analysis and discuss how she gained influence in the business community. I outline how industrial psychologists collected data to disprove her theories and I argue that those efforts that attempted to delineate evidence-based practice from her methods were some of the first efforts to show that science mattered in the workplace. In addition, Blackford's media savviness taught applied psychologists that to have an impact across a broader audience, they needed to better market themselves. Although industrial psychologists succeeded in discrediting Blackford's system, I argue that her work exerted significant influence on the methodology and practice of early industrial psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The rise and fall of Katherine Blackford's character analysis.","authors":"Michael J Zickar","doi":"10.1037/hop0000264","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dr. Katherine Blackford's writings on physiognomy-based character analysis were popular in the business community during the period roughly from 1914 to 1925. I document the rise of the Blackford System of character analysis and discuss how she gained influence in the business community. I outline how industrial psychologists collected data to disprove her theories and I argue that those efforts that attempted to delineate evidence-based practice from her methods were some of the first efforts to show that science mattered in the workplace. In addition, Blackford's media savviness taught applied psychologists that to have an impact across a broader audience, they needed to better market themselves. Although industrial psychologists succeeded in discrediting Blackford's system, I argue that her work exerted significant influence on the methodology and practice of early industrial psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"350-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1037/hop0000265
Wayne Viney
The major focus of this work is on William James's insistence that unification should not be explored in the abstract as if it were one thing. Rather, unity should be understood in terms of its major kinds. There are unities and pluralities with respect to such topics as values, methods, causes, and prescriptions about what to read and study. This article explores James's mature position on unification as set forth in his major psychological and philosophical works and letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
这部著作的主要重点在于威廉-詹姆斯坚持认为,不应抽象地把统一当作一件事物来探讨。相反,应该从统一的主要类型来理解统一。在价值观、方法、原因以及关于阅读和研究什么的规定等主题方面,既有统一性,也有多元性。本文探讨了詹姆斯在其主要心理学和哲学著作及书信中阐述的关于统一性的成熟立场。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"William James on unification.","authors":"Wayne Viney","doi":"10.1037/hop0000265","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The major focus of this work is on William James's insistence that unification should not be explored in the abstract as if it were one thing. Rather, unity should be understood in terms of its major kinds. There are unities and pluralities with respect to such topics as values, methods, causes, and prescriptions about what to read and study. This article explores James's mature position on unification as set forth in his major psychological and philosophical works and letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1037/hop0000266
Shawn M Bediako
For nearly four decades, Herman G. Canady actively promoted psychological science in the public interest. A skillful leader and administrator, Canady helped to establish one of the first national organizations of Black psychologists and was purportedly one of the founding members of the West Virginia State Psychological Association. He also collaborated with a diverse range of professional colleagues on relevant social issues of the time. Despite the depth and breadth of Canady's contributions to psychology, very little is known about his impact on the field. The goal of this article is to reintroduce the discipline to Canady. Drawing upon a range of archival materials, personal correspondence, and interviews, I highlight how Canady used the platform of psychological science in ways that not only redefined "racial psychology," but also brought attention to educational inequities, stressed the importance of institution-building, and demonstrated the utility of cross-cultural alliances for addressing important social causes. Canady's influence-and that of others of his generation-merits further study and deeper analysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
近四十年来,赫尔曼-G-卡纳迪(Herman G. Canady)积极推动心理科学的公共利益。作为一名娴熟的领导者和管理者,卡纳迪帮助建立了最早的全国性黑人心理学家组织之一,据称他还是西弗吉尼亚州心理学协会的创始成员之一。他还就当时的相关社会问题与不同的专业同行进行了合作。尽管卡纳迪对心理学的贡献既深且广,但人们对他对该领域的影响却知之甚少。本文旨在重新介绍卡纳迪。我利用一系列档案资料、私人信件和访谈,重点介绍了卡纳迪如何利用心理学科学的平台,不仅重新定义了 "种族心理学",还引起了人们对教育不公平现象的关注,强调了机构建设的重要性,并展示了跨文化联盟在解决重要社会问题方面的作用。卡纳迪以及他那一代人的影响值得我们进一步研究和深入分析。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Herman G. Canady: A reintroduction.","authors":"Shawn M Bediako","doi":"10.1037/hop0000266","DOIUrl":"10.1037/hop0000266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For nearly four decades, Herman G. Canady actively promoted psychological science in the public interest. A skillful leader and administrator, Canady helped to establish one of the first national organizations of Black psychologists and was purportedly one of the founding members of the West Virginia State Psychological Association. He also collaborated with a diverse range of professional colleagues on relevant social issues of the time. Despite the depth and breadth of Canady's contributions to psychology, very little is known about his impact on the field. The goal of this article is to reintroduce the discipline to Canady. Drawing upon a range of archival materials, personal correspondence, and interviews, I highlight how Canady used the platform of psychological science in ways that not only redefined \"racial psychology,\" but also brought attention to educational inequities, stressed the importance of institution-building, and demonstrated the utility of cross-cultural alliances for addressing important social causes. Canady's influence-and that of others of his generation-merits further study and deeper analysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"384-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}