Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342
Francis Mulloy, D. Mullineaux, P. Graham-Smith, G. Irwin
Abstract A simple method to quantify the kinematic chain in a propulsive task would facilitate assessment of athlete effectiveness. The study’s aim was to assess if the kinematic chain distinguishes between skill levels. Fencers were separated into two groups based on attacking lunge ability (7 skilled; 8 novices). Rear leg 3D joint angular extension velocity magnitudes and timings, sword kinematics and rear leg kinetics were obtained in the propulsion phase of the attacking lunge. Skilled fencers obtained greater sword velocity (3.24 ± 0.24 m∙s−1 vs. 2.69 ± 0.29 m∙s−1; p = 0.02). The skilled group had a greater sequential kinematic chain of the hip, knee and ankle, demonstrated by significantly greater ankle angular velocity (9.1 ± 2.1 rad·s−1 skilled; 5.4 ± 2.9 rad·s−1 novice). Ankle plantarflexion velocity showed a strong positive correlation with horizontal peak force (r = 0.81; p < 0.01). The skilled group demonstrated greater horizontal impulse (1.85 ± 0.29 N·s·kg−1 skilled; 1.45 ± 0.32 N·s·kg−1 novice), suggesting greater effectiveness in applying the kinematic chain towards horizontal propulsion. Analysis of the kinematic chain, which was able to distinguish between skill levels in a propulsive task, is an effective and simple paradigm to assess whole limb contributions to propulsive movements.
{"title":"An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge","authors":"Francis Mulloy, D. Mullineaux, P. Graham-Smith, G. Irwin","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A simple method to quantify the kinematic chain in a propulsive task would facilitate assessment of athlete effectiveness. The study’s aim was to assess if the kinematic chain distinguishes between skill levels. Fencers were separated into two groups based on attacking lunge ability (7 skilled; 8 novices). Rear leg 3D joint angular extension velocity magnitudes and timings, sword kinematics and rear leg kinetics were obtained in the propulsion phase of the attacking lunge. Skilled fencers obtained greater sword velocity (3.24 ± 0.24 m∙s−1 vs. 2.69 ± 0.29 m∙s−1; p = 0.02). The skilled group had a greater sequential kinematic chain of the hip, knee and ankle, demonstrated by significantly greater ankle angular velocity (9.1 ± 2.1 rad·s−1 skilled; 5.4 ± 2.9 rad·s−1 novice). Ankle plantarflexion velocity showed a strong positive correlation with horizontal peak force (r = 0.81; p < 0.01). The skilled group demonstrated greater horizontal impulse (1.85 ± 0.29 N·s·kg−1 skilled; 1.45 ± 0.32 N·s·kg−1 novice), suggesting greater effectiveness in applying the kinematic chain towards horizontal propulsion. Analysis of the kinematic chain, which was able to distinguish between skill levels in a propulsive task, is an effective and simple paradigm to assess whole limb contributions to propulsive movements.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"9 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46733742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2018.1472038
J. Washington, G. Oliver
Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics of two hitting conditions: stationary tee and front toss from a practice pitcher. Twenty-two NCAA Division I Collegiate softball players (20.3 ± 1.5 years; 166.6 ± 6.3 cm; 68.0 ± 7.5 kg) participated. Participants executed five maximum effort swings from a stationary tee and five swings from a front toss practice pitcher. Data for each kinematic variable were averaged for the five maximal effort swings of each condition and analyzed using a within-subject repeated measures ANOVA. The front toss condition revealed significantly greater lead knee flexion at foot contact and greater trunk rotation towards the back side at ball contact. The tee condition revealed greater trunk lateral flexion to the back side at foot contact, greater trunk rotation towards the lead side at follow through, and greater pelvis rotation towards the lead side at follow through. This study most significantly indicates that swing mechanics are different between specific training methods; therefore, athletes should implement techniques most applicable to a competition setting such as the front toss.
{"title":"Kinematic differences between hitting off a tee versus front toss in collegiate softball players","authors":"J. Washington, G. Oliver","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2018.1472038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1472038","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics of two hitting conditions: stationary tee and front toss from a practice pitcher. Twenty-two NCAA Division I Collegiate softball players (20.3 ± 1.5 years; 166.6 ± 6.3 cm; 68.0 ± 7.5 kg) participated. Participants executed five maximum effort swings from a stationary tee and five swings from a front toss practice pitcher. Data for each kinematic variable were averaged for the five maximal effort swings of each condition and analyzed using a within-subject repeated measures ANOVA. The front toss condition revealed significantly greater lead knee flexion at foot contact and greater trunk rotation towards the back side at ball contact. The tee condition revealed greater trunk lateral flexion to the back side at foot contact, greater trunk rotation towards the lead side at follow through, and greater pelvis rotation towards the lead side at follow through. This study most significantly indicates that swing mechanics are different between specific training methods; therefore, athletes should implement techniques most applicable to a competition setting such as the front toss.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"30 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2018.1472038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46829841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2018.1512375
Mansi P. Joshi, Prakruti Patel, T. Bhatt
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanism of fall risk in community-dwelling ambulatory hemiplegic stroke survivors when exposed to a sudden, trip-like support surface perturbation in standing. Participants (n = 14 / group) included stroke survivors, Age-similar older controls (AC), and Young controls (YC) experienced trip-like perturbation on a motorized treadmill. The primary outcomes were COM state control (measured as COM position (XCOM/BOS) and velocity (VCOM/BOS) relative to the base of support (BOS)) and the vertical limb support recorded as the extent of hip descent. All participants demonstrated forward loss of balance (FLOB) followed by an equal first compensatory step length. At step touchdown, stroke survivors demonstrated lower COM state stability and increased trunk flexion than the YC group. Stroke survivors also demonstrated greater hip descent than YC and AC groups, as they first stepped with their non-paretic limb. For the second compensatory step, the stroke survivors stepped with their paretic limb. However, unlike the AC group, they were unable to control VCOM/BOS despite a longer compensatory step. In conclusion, poor control of COM state, impaired trunk control and inability of the paretic limb to provide vertical limb support may explain the higher fall-risk in stroke survivors.
{"title":"Reactive balance to unanticipated trip-like perturbations: a treadmill-based study examining effect of aging and stroke on fall risk","authors":"Mansi P. Joshi, Prakruti Patel, T. Bhatt","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2018.1512375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1512375","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanism of fall risk in community-dwelling ambulatory hemiplegic stroke survivors when exposed to a sudden, trip-like support surface perturbation in standing. Participants (n = 14 / group) included stroke survivors, Age-similar older controls (AC), and Young controls (YC) experienced trip-like perturbation on a motorized treadmill. The primary outcomes were COM state control (measured as COM position (XCOM/BOS) and velocity (VCOM/BOS) relative to the base of support (BOS)) and the vertical limb support recorded as the extent of hip descent. All participants demonstrated forward loss of balance (FLOB) followed by an equal first compensatory step length. At step touchdown, stroke survivors demonstrated lower COM state stability and increased trunk flexion than the YC group. Stroke survivors also demonstrated greater hip descent than YC and AC groups, as they first stepped with their non-paretic limb. For the second compensatory step, the stroke survivors stepped with their paretic limb. However, unlike the AC group, they were unable to control VCOM/BOS despite a longer compensatory step. In conclusion, poor control of COM state, impaired trunk control and inability of the paretic limb to provide vertical limb support may explain the higher fall-risk in stroke survivors.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"75 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2018.1512375","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42529502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2018.1481767
I. Theodorakos, Jan Rueterbories, M. Lund, E. Eils, M. Andersen, M. de Zee, U. Kersting
ABSTRACT Ankle bracing is commonly used to prevent ankle sprain occurrences. The present study investigated the effects of a semi-rigid ankle brace on the ankle joint complex during landing on inclined surfaces. Seventeen recreational athletes performed a single leg landing task onto three different surface alignments (everted, neutral, inverted), with and without the brace. Ground reaction forces (GRF), kinematics, and brace pressure were recorded. Six two-way repeated measures MANOVA tested for differences in GRF, talocrural and subtalar kinematics and kinetics. Participants landed with a significantly less plantar flexed (P < 0.001) and more everted (P = 0.001) foot during the braced condition. Although no differences were observed for the joint moments, an increased subtalar compression force (P = 0.009) was observed with the brace. Landing on the inverted surface resulted in significantly higher peak magnitudes of the vertical and the mediolateral GRF and the talocrural inversion moment compared to landing on the neutral surface. Ankle bracing altered ankle kinematics by restricting the ROM of the ankle joint complex. This study confirmed that landing on inverted surfaces may increase the risk for lateral ankle ligaments injuries. The significantly higher subtalar compression force during the brace condition might contribute to overuse injuries.
{"title":"Effects of a semi-rigid ankle brace on ankle joint loading during landing on inclined surfaces","authors":"I. Theodorakos, Jan Rueterbories, M. Lund, E. Eils, M. Andersen, M. de Zee, U. Kersting","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2018.1481767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1481767","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ankle bracing is commonly used to prevent ankle sprain occurrences. The present study investigated the effects of a semi-rigid ankle brace on the ankle joint complex during landing on inclined surfaces. Seventeen recreational athletes performed a single leg landing task onto three different surface alignments (everted, neutral, inverted), with and without the brace. Ground reaction forces (GRF), kinematics, and brace pressure were recorded. Six two-way repeated measures MANOVA tested for differences in GRF, talocrural and subtalar kinematics and kinetics. Participants landed with a significantly less plantar flexed (P < 0.001) and more everted (P = 0.001) foot during the braced condition. Although no differences were observed for the joint moments, an increased subtalar compression force (P = 0.009) was observed with the brace. Landing on the inverted surface resulted in significantly higher peak magnitudes of the vertical and the mediolateral GRF and the talocrural inversion moment compared to landing on the neutral surface. Ankle bracing altered ankle kinematics by restricting the ROM of the ankle joint complex. This study confirmed that landing on inverted surfaces may increase the risk for lateral ankle ligaments injuries. The significantly higher subtalar compression force during the brace condition might contribute to overuse injuries.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"46 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2018.1481767","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48832241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2018.1426496
R. Di Marco, E. Scalona, Alessandra Pacilli, P. Cappa, C. Mazzà, S. Rossi
Abstract Repeatability and reproducibility indices are often used in gait analysis to validate models and assess patients in their follow-up. When comparing joint kinematics, their interpretation can be ambiguous due to a lack of understanding of the exact sources of their variations. This paper studied four indices (Root Mean Square Deviation, Mean Absolute Variability, Coefficient of Multiple Correlation, and Linear Fit Method) in relation to five confusing-factors: joints’ range of motion, sample-by-sample amplitude variability, offset, time shift and curve shape. A first simulation was conducted to test the mathematics behind each index. A second simulation tested the influence of the curve shape on the indices using a Fourier’s decomposition. The Coefficient of Multiple Correlation and the Linear Fit method Coefficients were independent from the range of motion. Different Coefficients of Multiple Correlation were found among different joints, leading to misinterpretation of the results. The Linear Fit Method coefficients should not be adopted when time shift increases. Root Mean Square Deviation and Mean Absolute Variability were sensitive to all the confusing-factors. The Linear Fit Method coefficients seemed to be the most suitable to assess gait data variability, complemented with Root Mean Square Deviation or Mean Absolute Variability as measurements of data dispersion.
{"title":"How to choose and interpret similarity indices to quantify the variability in gait joint kinematics","authors":"R. Di Marco, E. Scalona, Alessandra Pacilli, P. Cappa, C. Mazzà, S. Rossi","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2018.1426496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1426496","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Repeatability and reproducibility indices are often used in gait analysis to validate models and assess patients in their follow-up. When comparing joint kinematics, their interpretation can be ambiguous due to a lack of understanding of the exact sources of their variations. This paper studied four indices (Root Mean Square Deviation, Mean Absolute Variability, Coefficient of Multiple Correlation, and Linear Fit Method) in relation to five confusing-factors: joints’ range of motion, sample-by-sample amplitude variability, offset, time shift and curve shape. A first simulation was conducted to test the mathematics behind each index. A second simulation tested the influence of the curve shape on the indices using a Fourier’s decomposition. The Coefficient of Multiple Correlation and the Linear Fit method Coefficients were independent from the range of motion. Different Coefficients of Multiple Correlation were found among different joints, leading to misinterpretation of the results. The Linear Fit Method coefficients should not be adopted when time shift increases. Root Mean Square Deviation and Mean Absolute Variability were sensitive to all the confusing-factors. The Linear Fit Method coefficients seemed to be the most suitable to assess gait data variability, complemented with Root Mean Square Deviation or Mean Absolute Variability as measurements of data dispersion.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2018.1426496","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43656905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-03DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741
B. Michaud, S. Duprey, M. Begon
Abstract Several numerical approaches have been developed to address the soft tissue artefact, such as the segmental optimization and multibody kinematics optimizations using either open-loop or closed-loop chains. However, it is still not clear which method is the most efficient for scapular kinematics reconstruction. In this study, six kinematic models were compared to a silver standard, i.e. a scapula palpator, during a series of 55 postures with maximal amplitudes of both the arm and scapula performed by 15 subjects. The most accurate approaches were the multibody optimization with a closed-loop chain and the segmental optimization. They provided averaged scapula misorientations of 14.9 ± 6.7° and 16 ± 7.1, respectively. Regarding the closed-loop chain integrating a point-to-ellipsoid scapulothoracic joint, the ellipsoid providing the most accurate results was a thorax-size ellipsoid fitting the area browsed by the scapula. Eventually, considering the high implementation costs of a multibody kinematics optimization, the segmental optimization could be considered as appropriate for scapular kinematics reconstruction.
{"title":"Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred?","authors":"B. Michaud, S. Duprey, M. Begon","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Several numerical approaches have been developed to address the soft tissue artefact, such as the segmental optimization and multibody kinematics optimizations using either open-loop or closed-loop chains. However, it is still not clear which method is the most efficient for scapular kinematics reconstruction. In this study, six kinematic models were compared to a silver standard, i.e. a scapula palpator, during a series of 55 postures with maximal amplitudes of both the arm and scapula performed by 15 subjects. The most accurate approaches were the multibody optimization with a closed-loop chain and the segmental optimization. They provided averaged scapula misorientations of 14.9 ± 6.7° and 16 ± 7.1, respectively. Regarding the closed-loop chain integrating a point-to-ellipsoid scapulothoracic joint, the ellipsoid providing the most accurate results was a thorax-size ellipsoid fitting the area browsed by the scapula. Eventually, considering the high implementation costs of a multibody kinematics optimization, the segmental optimization could be considered as appropriate for scapular kinematics reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"86 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41734095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-03DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2017.1372217
Justin L. Staker, Amy E. Lelwica, P. Ludewig, Jonathan P. Braman
Abstract Understanding clinical test kinematics improves utility of exam techniques. The purposes of this study were as follows: (1) determine inter-examiner repeatability of translation magnitude for the Anterior/Posterior Drawer and Sulcus shoulder laxity tests; (2) describe the relationships between glenohumeral joint translations and subjective grades for each laxity test; and (3) describe the relationship of overall glenohumeral joint laxity to a composite subjective score from the three laxity tests. Eleven subjects with shoulder symptomology were examined with three laxity tests. Motion was tracked with electromagnetic sensors affixed to the humerus and scapula via transcortical pins. ICCs were calculated to determine repeatability of translation magnitudes between two examiners for each test. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed for comparisons of single laxity test grades with translation magnitudes and for composite subjective laxity scores and overall translation across all three tests. Inter-examiner ICCs regarding kinematic repeatability were 0.87 for Anterior Drawer, 0.84 for the Sulcus test, and not calculable for the Posterior Drawer. No linear relationships between subjective grades of individual tests and translation magnitudes were found. The relationship of overall translation with the composite subjective score from all laxity tests was r2 = 0.75 (r = 0.86). Clinicians from different disciplines are capable of imparting similar translations during laxity tests. Single-test subjective laxity grades demonstrate large ranges of translation between subjects for the same grade. By combining results of three laxity tests, clinicians are capable of identifying the level of overall shoulder joint laxity in patients.
{"title":"Three-dimensional kinematics of shoulder laxity examination and the relationship to clinical interpretation*","authors":"Justin L. Staker, Amy E. Lelwica, P. Ludewig, Jonathan P. Braman","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2017.1372217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1372217","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understanding clinical test kinematics improves utility of exam techniques. The purposes of this study were as follows: (1) determine inter-examiner repeatability of translation magnitude for the Anterior/Posterior Drawer and Sulcus shoulder laxity tests; (2) describe the relationships between glenohumeral joint translations and subjective grades for each laxity test; and (3) describe the relationship of overall glenohumeral joint laxity to a composite subjective score from the three laxity tests. Eleven subjects with shoulder symptomology were examined with three laxity tests. Motion was tracked with electromagnetic sensors affixed to the humerus and scapula via transcortical pins. ICCs were calculated to determine repeatability of translation magnitudes between two examiners for each test. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed for comparisons of single laxity test grades with translation magnitudes and for composite subjective laxity scores and overall translation across all three tests. Inter-examiner ICCs regarding kinematic repeatability were 0.87 for Anterior Drawer, 0.84 for the Sulcus test, and not calculable for the Posterior Drawer. No linear relationships between subjective grades of individual tests and translation magnitudes were found. The relationship of overall translation with the composite subjective score from all laxity tests was r2 = 0.75 (r = 0.86). Clinicians from different disciplines are capable of imparting similar translations during laxity tests. Single-test subjective laxity grades demonstrate large ranges of translation between subjects for the same grade. By combining results of three laxity tests, clinicians are capable of identifying the level of overall shoulder joint laxity in patients.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"77 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2017.1372217","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41684356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-03DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2017.1364666
Immaculada Llop-Harillo, A. Pérez-González
Abstract In the present study, we propose a new actuation device and protocol for testing the grasping performance of low-cost 3D-printed hand prototypes. The actuation device is connected to the forearm of a healthy user and allows him to use his thumb and fingers to control any prototype moved by up to six tendons attached to this device. The protocol includes grasping actions on 24 different objects using eight typical grasp types to obtain a grasping ability score and information about the coordination of motion among the fingers. This study also presents a new design for a low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic hand, called the IMMA hand. Preliminary tests were performed with the IMMA hand and the actuation device on two subjects, using the protocol, to assess the validity of the device for the experimental evaluation of hand prototypes in early design stages. The analysis of the results of these tests shows that the coordination of motions among fingers is quite similar for both subjects, indicating a similar control of the artificial hand. Index and ring finger motions are highly correlated in over half of the grasp actions performed for both subjects.
{"title":"System for the experimental evaluation of anthropomorphic hands. Application to a new 3D-printed prosthetic hand prototype","authors":"Immaculada Llop-Harillo, A. Pérez-González","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2017.1364666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1364666","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present study, we propose a new actuation device and protocol for testing the grasping performance of low-cost 3D-printed hand prototypes. The actuation device is connected to the forearm of a healthy user and allows him to use his thumb and fingers to control any prototype moved by up to six tendons attached to this device. The protocol includes grasping actions on 24 different objects using eight typical grasp types to obtain a grasping ability score and information about the coordination of motion among the fingers. This study also presents a new design for a low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic hand, called the IMMA hand. Preliminary tests were performed with the IMMA hand and the actuation device on two subjects, using the protocol, to assess the validity of the device for the experimental evaluation of hand prototypes in early design stages. The analysis of the results of these tests shows that the coordination of motions among fingers is quite similar for both subjects, indicating a similar control of the artificial hand. Index and ring finger motions are highly correlated in over half of the grasp actions performed for both subjects.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"50 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2017.1364666","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49534085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-03DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2017.1326843
Angelica E. Lang, C. Dickerson
Abstract Purpose: This work generates a comprehensive description of upper extremity and torso kinematics of a healthy population during reaching and dexterity Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) tasks. Methods: Upper limb and torso kinematic data were collected from 30 young, healthy participants as they performed three common FCE tasks: repetitive reaching, fingertip dexterity, and hand and forearm dexterity. Kinematic profiles were created for all clinically relevant angles of the torso, shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Results: These provocative tasks require large ranges of motion and create high demand postures for the upper limb, specifically at the shoulder. Arm elevation was up to 90°, while humeral internal rotation of 25° was observed. Torso angles were typically below 30° from neutral and elbow flexion remained within 90°–120° for nearly all tasks. Wrist ulnar deviation ranged from 0° to 26° for both wrists. Conclusion: The normative data created in this investigation provide a description of healthy motion during reaching and dexterity tasks. These normative curves are the initial step towards understanding movement that would contraindicate return to work during an FCE. This work supports a future clinical goal of being able to identify persons at risk of further injury or disability if returned to work too early.
{"title":"Normative kinematics of reaching and dexterity tasks: moving towards a quantitative baseline for Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs)","authors":"Angelica E. Lang, C. Dickerson","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2017.1326843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1326843","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: This work generates a comprehensive description of upper extremity and torso kinematics of a healthy population during reaching and dexterity Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) tasks. Methods: Upper limb and torso kinematic data were collected from 30 young, healthy participants as they performed three common FCE tasks: repetitive reaching, fingertip dexterity, and hand and forearm dexterity. Kinematic profiles were created for all clinically relevant angles of the torso, shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Results: These provocative tasks require large ranges of motion and create high demand postures for the upper limb, specifically at the shoulder. Arm elevation was up to 90°, while humeral internal rotation of 25° was observed. Torso angles were typically below 30° from neutral and elbow flexion remained within 90°–120° for nearly all tasks. Wrist ulnar deviation ranged from 0° to 26° for both wrists. Conclusion: The normative data created in this investigation provide a description of healthy motion during reaching and dexterity tasks. These normative curves are the initial step towards understanding movement that would contraindicate return to work during an FCE. This work supports a future clinical goal of being able to identify persons at risk of further injury or disability if returned to work too early.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"37 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2017.1326843","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42366619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-03DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2017.1364668
M. Wochatz, Sophie Rabe, M. Wolter, T. Engel, Steffen Mueller, F. Mayer
Abstract Altered scapular muscle activity is mostly described under unloaded and submaximal loaded conditions in impingement patients. However, there is no clear evidence on muscle activity with respect to movement phases under maximum load in healthy subjects. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate scapular muscle activity under unloaded and maximum loaded isokinetic shoulder flexion and extension in regard to the movement phase. Fourteen adults performed unloaded (continuous passive motion [CPM]) as well as maximum loaded (concentric [CON], eccentric [ECC]) isokinetic shoulder flexion (Flex) and extension (Ext). Simultaneously, scapular muscle activity was measured by EMG. Root mean square was calculated for the whole ROM and four movement phases. Data were analyzed descriptively and by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. CPMFlex resulted in a linear increase of muscle activity for all muscles. Muscle activity during CONFlex and ECCFlex resulted in either constant activity levels or in an initial increase followed by a plateau in the second half of movement. CPMExt decreased with the progression of movement, whereas CONExt and ECCExt initially decreased and either levelled off or increased in the second half of movement. Scapular muscle activity of unloaded shoulder flexion and extension changed under maximum load showing increased activity levels and an altered pattern over the course of movement.
{"title":"Muscle activity of upper and lower trapezius and serratus anterior during unloaded and maximal loaded shoulder flexion and extension","authors":"M. Wochatz, Sophie Rabe, M. Wolter, T. Engel, Steffen Mueller, F. Mayer","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2017.1364668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1364668","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Altered scapular muscle activity is mostly described under unloaded and submaximal loaded conditions in impingement patients. However, there is no clear evidence on muscle activity with respect to movement phases under maximum load in healthy subjects. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate scapular muscle activity under unloaded and maximum loaded isokinetic shoulder flexion and extension in regard to the movement phase. Fourteen adults performed unloaded (continuous passive motion [CPM]) as well as maximum loaded (concentric [CON], eccentric [ECC]) isokinetic shoulder flexion (Flex) and extension (Ext). Simultaneously, scapular muscle activity was measured by EMG. Root mean square was calculated for the whole ROM and four movement phases. Data were analyzed descriptively and by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. CPMFlex resulted in a linear increase of muscle activity for all muscles. Muscle activity during CONFlex and ECCFlex resulted in either constant activity levels or in an initial increase followed by a plateau in the second half of movement. CPMExt decreased with the progression of movement, whereas CONExt and ECCExt initially decreased and either levelled off or increased in the second half of movement. Scapular muscle activity of unloaded shoulder flexion and extension changed under maximum load showing increased activity levels and an altered pattern over the course of movement.","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"4 1","pages":"68 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2017.1364668","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47231142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：