Objective
We reviewed the available literature on patients undergoing aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with either aortic root preservation (RP) or root replacement (RR).
Methods
Original research studies that evaluated the long-term outcomes of the RP versus RR group were identified from 2000 to 2025. Median overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Reoperation-free OS was the secondary endpoint. Sensitivity analyses were performed including risk-adjusted populations, subgroups, and using the leave-one-out method.
Results
Seventeen studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis, incorporating data from 7569 patients with a follow-up period of up to 25 years. According to our analysis, RP (4266 patients) demonstrated higher OS compared to RR (2589 patients) groups (HR: 0.83; 95% CI:0.76, 0.91; p < 0.01). The median OS was 13.57 years for the RP group and 13.48 years for the RR group. Nonetheless, the reoperation-free OS was higher in the RR group (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.67; p < 0.01). Valve-sparing RR (VSRR) demonstrated the highest long-term OS (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
RP is associated with superior OS but a higher risk of reoperation, while RR offers greater durability with fewer reoperations, and VSRR may provide the optimal balance of longevity and native valve preservation, warranting further prospective studies.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:

