British paramedic journal最新文献

Introduction: Dementia is a common co-morbidity in older people who require urgent or emergency ambulance attendance and influences clinical decisions and care pathways. Following an initial audit of dementia data and consultation with staff, a specific section (tab) to record dementia was introduced on an ambulance service electronic patient record (ePR). This includes a dementia diagnosis button and a free-text section. We aimed to assess whether and how this improved recording.

Methods: To re-audit the proportion of ambulance ePRs where dementia is recorded for patients aged ≥65 years, and to describe the frequency of recording in patients aged <65; to analyse discrepancies in the place of recording dementia on the ePR by comparing data from the new dementia tab and other sections of the ePR.

Results: We included 112,193 ePRs of patients aged ≥65 with ambulance attendance from a six-month period. The proportion with dementia recorded in patients aged ≥65 was 16.5%, increasing to 19.9% in patients aged ≥75, as compared to 13.5% (≥65) and 16.5% (≥75) in our previous audit. In this audit, of the 16.5% (n = 18,515) of records with dementia recorded, 69.9% (n = 12,939) used the dementia button and 25.4% (n = 4704) recorded text in the dementia tab. Dementia was recorded in ePR free-text fields (but not the dementia tab) in 29.7% of records. Eighteen other free-text fields were used in addition to, or instead of, the dementia tab, including the patient's social history, previous medical history and mental health. Dementia was present on the ePR of 0.4% (n = 461) of patients aged <65.

Conclusions: An ePR dementia tab enabled ambulance clinicians to standardise the location of recording dementia and may have facilitated increased recording. We would recommend other ambulance trusts capture this information in a specific section to improve information sharing and to inform care planning for this patient group.

The term 'zero responder' was initially devised in 2010 to describe those passing by or unharmed in a mass casualty incident, who provide life-saving care for injured persons before qualified professionals arrive. This review aims to determine how the literature defines the role of the zero responder and to explore how they can be better integrated into the emergency response. Current definitions of the zero responder in a medical setting were found through a literature search of several databases and online libraries using defined search terms. Additionally, a manual search of citations in included articles was performed to yield more results. In total, 16 papers defining the zero responder were included. These definitions were evaluated, and a revised definition was suggested to clarify the role in a medical setting relating to mass casualty incidents. The role of the zero responder can be facilitated through authority recognition and adequate equipment provision. Familiarisation with the term and role of zero responders among ambulance services is essential for effective collaboration. Further research and clarity on the integration of these two groups is necessary to facilitate effective and safe working between them.

Introduction: In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.

Objective: To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.

Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.

Results: Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.

Conclusions: Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.