JBI evidence synthesis最新文献_第3页

Methods of training lay individuals in the use of evidence-based services for the management of mental and behavioral health disorders: a scoping review. 培训非专业人员使用基于证据的服务来管理精神和行为健康障碍的方法：范围审查。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00322

Ann D Bagchi, Pamela Hargwood, Yuri Jadotte, Arunadevi Saravana, Angelo M DiBello

Objective: This objective of this scoping review was to describe how lay individuals have been trained to deliver evidence-based services to manage mental and behavioral health disorders.Introduction: Health service delivery by lay individuals is commonly used for managing mental and behavioral health disorders in low-resource settings. Prior systematic reviews have examined the characteristics of lay health workers, the types of services they provide, and the efficacy of their services; however, a significant gap exists in documenting the training these individuals receive.Eligibility criteria: Participants were lay individuals trained to provide services to community residents, excluding individuals with formal training in health service delivery and delivery in residential settings. The concept was training programs for the delivery of evidence-based services to individuals, excluding services involving pharmacology. The context was mental and behavioral health disorders, excluding cognitive deficits.Methods: Our search included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and gray literature sources. The search included reports published between 1960 and November 2024 that were in English or Spanish or had English translations available. Data analysis used a mix of descriptive and qualitative approaches. Since missing data in the existing literature were considered a finding itself, we did not contact authors to provide information on elements missing from the data extraction form.Results: After completing the evidence selection process, we extracted data from 203 studies. Included studies used a wide variety of terms to describe lay health workers. Consistent with prior literature, this scoping review identified 2 categories of lay individuals who have been trained to deliver mental and behavioral health services: general lay health workers (described as trusted community members) and peer workers (lay individuals with personal experience of mental and behavioral health disorders). The number of studies has increased over time, with the first study published in 1974. Overall, the largest percentage of studies (43.3%) was conducted in the US. Comparing the literature conducted in low- and middle-income countries with the literature in high-income countries, the general lay health worker model predominated in low- and middle-income countries, while the peer model was more common in high-income countries. The most common psychotherapeutic techniques that lay health workers were trained to deliver were cognitive behavior therapy, motivational interviewing, and behavioral activation; however, one-fourth of the studies did not indicate which techniques were taught in the training. Due to missing data and variations in design, it was difficult to estimate the time spent training lay

目的：本范围审查的目的是描述如何培训非专业人员提供以证据为基础的服务来管理精神和行为健康障碍。由非专业人员提供卫生服务通常用于管理低资源环境中的精神和行为健康障碍。以前的系统审查审查了非专业卫生工作者的特点、他们提供的服务类型及其服务的效力；然而，在记录这些个人接受的培训方面存在着重大差距。资格标准：参与者是接受过向社区居民提供服务培训的非专业人员，不包括接受过提供保健服务和在住宅环境中提供服务的正式培训的个人。这个概念是为个人提供循证服务的培训项目，不包括涉及药理学的服务。研究的背景是精神和行为健康障碍，不包括认知缺陷。方法：我们的检索包括MEDLINE， CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Scopus， Web of Science和灰色文献来源。搜索包括1960年至2024年11月期间发表的英语或西班牙语或有英语翻译的文章。数据分析混合使用了描述性和定性方法。由于现有文献中的缺失数据本身被认为是一种发现，因此我们没有联系作者提供数据提取表中缺失元素的信息。结果：在完成证据选择过程后，我们从204项研究中提取了数据。纳入的研究使用了各种各样的术语来描述非专业卫生工作者。与先前的文献一致，本范围审查确定了两类接受过精神和行为健康服务培训的非专业人员：普通非专业卫生工作者（被描述为可信赖的社区成员）和同伴工作者（有精神和行为健康障碍个人经历的非专业人员）。随着时间的推移，研究的数量不断增加，第一篇论文发表于1974年。总体而言，在美国进行的研究比例最大（41.3%）。比较低收入和中等收入国家与高收入国家的文献，一般非专业卫生工作者模式在低收入和中等收入国家占主导地位，而同伴模式在高收入国家更为常见。非专业卫生工作者接受过的最常见的心理治疗技术是认知行为疗法、动机性访谈和行为激活；然而，四分之一的研究没有指出培训中教授了哪些技术。由于缺少数据和设计上的差异，很难估计培训非专业人员所选择的干预措施所花费的时间，也很难对非专业卫生工作者/同行的人口统计学特征做出明确的描述。最后，只有27项研究（13.2%）提到减少耻辱感是培训的一部分。结论：非专业人员提供心理和行为健康服务的培训存在很大差异。这在文献中留下了许多空白，并且很难得出关于最佳实践的结论。未来的研究可以利用本范围审查报告的信息来确定相关研究，并补充现有的数据报告模板（例如，干预描述和复制模板[TIDieR]），以评估培训非专业人员提供精神和行为健康服务的最佳做法的证据。评审注册：OSF https://osf.io/eaqcr/overview。

{"title":"Methods of training lay individuals in the use of evidence-based services for the management of mental and behavioral health disorders: a scoping review.","authors":"Ann D Bagchi, Pamela Hargwood, Yuri Jadotte, Arunadevi Saravana, Angelo M DiBello","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00322","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00322","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This objective of this scoping review was to describe how lay individuals have been trained to deliver evidence-based services to manage mental and behavioral health disorders.Introduction: Health service delivery by lay individuals is commonly used for managing mental and behavioral health disorders in low-resource settings. Prior systematic reviews have examined the characteristics of lay health workers, the types of services they provide, and the efficacy of their services; however, a significant gap exists in documenting the training these individuals receive.Eligibility criteria: Participants were lay individuals trained to provide services to community residents, excluding individuals with formal training in health service delivery and delivery in residential settings. The concept was training programs for the delivery of evidence-based services to individuals, excluding services involving pharmacology. The context was mental and behavioral health disorders, excluding cognitive deficits.Methods: Our search included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and gray literature sources. The search included reports published between 1960 and November 2024 that were in English or Spanish or had English translations available. Data analysis used a mix of descriptive and qualitative approaches. Since missing data in the existing literature were considered a finding itself, we did not contact authors to provide information on elements missing from the data extraction form.Results: After completing the evidence selection process, we extracted data from 203 studies. Included studies used a wide variety of terms to describe lay health workers. Consistent with prior literature, this scoping review identified 2 categories of lay individuals who have been trained to deliver mental and behavioral health services: general lay health workers (described as trusted community members) and peer workers (lay individuals with personal experience of mental and behavioral health disorders). The number of studies has increased over time, with the first study published in 1974. Overall, the largest percentage of studies (43.3%) was conducted in the US. Comparing the literature conducted in low- and middle-income countries with the literature in high-income countries, the general lay health worker model predominated in low- and middle-income countries, while the peer model was more common in high-income countries. The most common psychotherapeutic techniques that lay health workers were trained to deliver were cognitive behavior therapy, motivational interviewing, and behavioral activation; however, one-fourth of the studies did not indicate which techniques were taught in the training. Due to missing data and variations in design, it was difficult to estimate the time spent training lay ","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"712-762"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Characteristics of available datasets for public mental health surveillance in Australia and evaluation of the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement: a scoping review protocol. 澳大利亚公共精神卫生监测现有数据集的特点和对《国家精神卫生和预防自杀协定：范围审查议定书》的评价。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00122

Hiroko Fujimoto, Narendar Manohar, Samuel B Harvey, Peter A Baldwin

Objective: This scoping review will identify and describe available datasets collected nationally to measure public mental health in Australia. The review will also identify gaps in current data collection by mapping the identified datasets to the priorities of the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement (2022).

Introduction: Australia's public mental health data collection has been fragmented by multiple initiatives and jurisdictional inconsistency. Data largely focus on service input and activity, ignoring other factors such as social determinants, prevention, and early intervention. To effectively assess and monitor Australia's mental health, researchers and policymakers need data that are consistent, inclusive, appropriate, and holistic.

Eligibility criteria: This scoping review focuses on Australian national data for public mental health surveillance, encompassing mental health promotion, symptoms, disorders, services, workforce, and prevention. Mental health conditions outside DSM-5 or ICD-11 will be excluded.

Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and Godin's gray literature search methods. The search strategy will involve hand-searching target websites. Language and region will be limited to English and Australia. The publication date will not be restricted. Search results, dataset selection, and data extraction will be recorded in a spreadsheet. Two rounds of screening will be conducted to finalize selection. Data will be extracted using an extraction table developed by the reviewers based on JBI methodology. Extracted data will be categorized into meaningful groups to answer the review questions. Data will be presented in tables and/or diagrams, accompanied by narrative summary.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/sa756.

目的：本范围审查将确定和描述在全国范围内收集的可用数据集，以衡量澳大利亚的公共心理健康。审查还将通过将已确定的数据集与《国家精神卫生和预防自杀协定》（2022年）的优先事项相对应，确定当前数据收集方面的差距。导言：澳大利亚的公共心理健康数据收集因多种举措和管辖权不一致而支离破碎。数据主要集中在服务投入和活动上，而忽略了其他因素，如社会决定因素、预防和早期干预。为了有效地评估和监测澳大利亚的心理健康，研究人员和政策制定者需要一致、包容、适当和全面的数据。资格标准：本次范围审查的重点是澳大利亚公共心理健康监测的国家数据，包括心理健康促进、症状、障碍、服务、劳动力和预防。DSM-5或ICD-11之外的精神健康状况将被排除在外。方法：按照JBI范围综述方法和Godin灰色文献检索方法进行综述。搜索策略包括手动搜索目标网站。语言和地区将仅限于英语和澳大利亚。出版日期不受限制。搜索结果、数据集选择和数据提取将记录在Excel电子表格中。将进行两轮筛选以最终确定。数据将使用由审稿人基于JBI方法开发的提取表进行提取。提取的数据将被分类为有意义的组来回答复习问题。数据将以表格和/或图表的形式呈现，并附有叙述性摘要。评审注册：OSF https://osf.io/sa756。

{"title":"Characteristics of available datasets for public mental health surveillance in Australia and evaluation of the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Hiroko Fujimoto, Narendar Manohar, Samuel B Harvey, Peter A Baldwin","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00122","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00122","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This scoping review will identify and describe available datasets collected nationally to measure public mental health in Australia. The review will also identify gaps in current data collection by mapping the identified datasets to the priorities of the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement (2022).Introduction: Australia's public mental health data collection has been fragmented by multiple initiatives and jurisdictional inconsistency. Data largely focus on service input and activity, ignoring other factors such as social determinants, prevention, and early intervention. To effectively assess and monitor Australia's mental health, researchers and policymakers need data that are consistent, inclusive, appropriate, and holistic.Eligibility criteria: This scoping review focuses on Australian national data for public mental health surveillance, encompassing mental health promotion, symptoms, disorders, services, workforce, and prevention. Mental health conditions outside DSM-5 or ICD-11 will be excluded.Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and Godin's gray literature search methods. The search strategy will involve hand-searching target websites. Language and region will be limited to English and Australia. The publication date will not be restricted. Search results, dataset selection, and data extraction will be recorded in a spreadsheet. Two rounds of screening will be conducted to finalize selection. Data will be extracted using an extraction table developed by the reviewers based on JBI methodology. Extracted data will be categorized into meaningful groups to answer the review questions. Data will be presented in tables and/or diagrams, accompanied by narrative summary.Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/sa756.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"833-841"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Facilitators and barriers to recruiting pregnant people with anxiety and depression for a group-based intervention: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. 招募焦虑和抑郁孕妇进行群体干预的促进因素和障碍：一种混合方法系统评价方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00127

Sudjit Liblub, Karen McLaughlin, Kirsty Pringle, Allison Cummins

Objective: This review aims to identify the facilitators and barriers to recruiting pregnant people with anxiety/depression into group-based intervention studies designed to support their mental health.

Introduction: Recruiting pregnant people, particularly those with anxiety/depression, for research studies is crucial for developing effective mental health interventions; however, this remains a significant challenge. There is a lack of focused evidence on the specific facilitators and barriers to recruiting participants for perinatal mental health studies.

Eligibility criteria: This review will include studies on pregnant people with anxiety/depression focusing on the facilitators and barriers to recruiting participants for group-based programs designed to support their mental health.

Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews and will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, PsycINFO (Ovid), and ScienceDirect. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest) and Google Scholar will be searched for grayliterature. The references of the relevant articles will be manually searched to identify additional studies. Identified studies will be independently assessed for inclusion by 2 reviewers. Independent double extraction of study characteristics and critical appraisal items will be conducted using standardized tools. Quantitative and qualitative data will be summarized in narrative and tabular format, and synthesized using a convergent integrated approach, in which quantitative data will be transformed to support the synthesis of narrative findings. Consistency will be verified by 2 reviewers, with any discrepancies resolved through discussion.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42025635015.

目的：本综述旨在确定招募焦虑/抑郁孕妇进入基于群体的干预研究的促进因素和障碍，以支持她们的心理健康。引言：招募孕妇，特别是患有焦虑/抑郁的孕妇进行研究，对于制定有效的心理健康干预措施至关重要；然而，这仍然是一个重大挑战。关于招募妇女参加围产期心理健康研究的具体促进因素和障碍，缺乏重点证据。入选标准：本综述将包括对焦虑/抑郁孕妇的研究，重点关注为支持其心理健康而设计的群体项目招募参与者的促进因素和障碍。方法：按照JBI混合方法系统评价方法学和系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）指南进行评价。我们将系统地检索PubMed， Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, PsycINFO （Ovid）和ScienceDirect。灰色文献将检索ProQuest dissertation and Theses （ProQuest）和谷歌Scholar。将人工检索相关文章的参考文献，以确定其他研究。确定的研究将由2位审稿人独立评估纳入。将使用标准化的关键评价工具对研究特征和关键评价项目进行独立的双重提取。定量和定性数据将以叙述和表格形式进行总结，并采用聚合综合方法进行综合，其中将对定量数据进行转换以支持叙述结果的综合。一致性将由2名审稿人进行验证，如有差异，通过讨论解决。审核注册：PROSPERO CRD42025635015。

{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to recruiting pregnant people with anxiety and depression for a group-based intervention: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sudjit Liblub, Karen McLaughlin, Kirsty Pringle, Allison Cummins","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00127","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00127","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This review aims to identify the facilitators and barriers to recruiting pregnant people with anxiety/depression into group-based intervention studies designed to support their mental health.Introduction: Recruiting pregnant people, particularly those with anxiety/depression, for research studies is crucial for developing effective mental health interventions; however, this remains a significant challenge. There is a lack of focused evidence on the specific facilitators and barriers to recruiting participants for perinatal mental health studies.Eligibility criteria: This review will include studies on pregnant people with anxiety/depression focusing on the facilitators and barriers to recruiting participants for group-based programs designed to support their mental health.Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews and will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, PsycINFO (Ovid), and ScienceDirect. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest) and Google Scholar will be searched for grayliterature. The references of the relevant articles will be manually searched to identify additional studies. Identified studies will be independently assessed for inclusion by 2 reviewers. Independent double extraction of study characteristics and critical appraisal items will be conducted using standardized tools. Quantitative and qualitative data will be summarized in narrative and tabular format, and synthesized using a convergent integrated approach, in which quantitative data will be transformed to support the synthesis of narrative findings. Consistency will be verified by 2 reviewers, with any discrepancies resolved through discussion.Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42025635015.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"798-805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. 非正式照顾者对癌症儿童的喂养经验：对定性证据的系统回顾。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00221

Donruedee Kamkhoad, Tippawan Srichalerm, Porawan Witwaranukool

Objective: The objective of this review was to synthesize informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer.Introduction: Alterations in eating behaviors among children with cancer affect their nutritional status, resulting in various adverse consequences. Besides interventions provided by health care professionals, the role of informal caregivers, often parents, family members, or relatives, in supporting and maintaining adequate nutrition is equally important. Exploring informal caregivers' experiences of feeding their children can offer valuable insights for enhancing nutritional care.Eligibility criteria: This review included qualitative studies, as well as the qualitative components of mixed methods studies, examining the experiences of informal caregivers in feeding children 2 to 18 years of age with cancer. Caregivers of any gender or age were included. Studies published in English or Thai up to August 18, 2025, were considered.Methods: This review followed the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (BVS), ThaiJO (TCI), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest). No language restrictions were applied and no date limit was set. Reference lists of the included studies were searched for additional relevant studies. Two reviewers separately screened for eligible studies and performed the critical appraisal. Two reviewers extracted the data, and 3 reviewers conducted the synthesis using meta-aggregation and summarized the findings. The final synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach.Results: A total of 28 studies across 13 countries, spanning 6 continents, were included. There were 137 extracted findings (unequivocal=135, credible=2) with narrative illustrations. These findings were combined to form 19 categories based on similarity in meaning and 4 synthesized findings: i) Informal caregivers of children with cancer adapted their meal preparation strategies, at times prioritizing a child's intake over nutritional value when appetite is poor; ii) Informal caregivers of children with cancer used a spectrum of strategies during mealtimes to support nutritional intake, from positive encouragement and incentivization to more coercive tactics; iii) Informal caregivers of children with cancer perceived their children's altered eating behaviors as significantly affecting caregivers' well-being and family dynamics; and iv) Informal caregivers of children with cancer face feeding-related difficulties shaped by both personal understanding and external support systems.Conclusions: This review highlights the diverse feeding strategies used by caregivers during meal preparation and mealtimes. Caregivers reported difficulties in managing their children's altered eating

目的：综述非正式护理人员喂养癌症患儿的经验。导读：癌症儿童饮食行为的改变会影响其营养状况，导致各种不良后果。除了卫生保健专业人员提供的干预措施外，非正式照料者，通常是父母、家庭成员或亲属，在支持和维持适当营养方面的作用也同样重要。探索非正规照料者喂养儿童的经验，可以为加强营养护理提供宝贵的见解。资格标准：本综述包括定性研究，以及混合方法研究的定性部分，检查非正式照顾者喂养2至18岁癌症儿童的经验。包括任何性别和年龄的照顾者。在2025年8月18日之前以英语或泰语发表的研究被纳入考虑范围。方法：本综述采用JBI方法进行定性系统评价。在PubMed、Embase （Ovid）、CINAHL （EBSCOhost）、Scopus、LILACS （BVS）、ThaiJO （TCI）和ProQuest Dissertations and Theses （ProQuest）中检索已发表的和灰色的文献。没有使用语言限制，也没有设定日期限制。检索纳入研究的参考文献，寻找其他相关研究。两名独立的审稿人分别筛选符合条件的研究并进行批判性评估。2名审稿人提取资料，3名审稿人采用meta-aggregation进行综合，并对结果进行总结。使用征服方法对最终的综合结果进行评分。结果：共纳入了横跨6大洲的13个国家的28项研究，其中有137项提取结果（明确=135，可信=2）和叙述性插图。这些发现根据意义上的相似性和4个综合发现合并成19个类别：i)癌症儿童的非正式照顾者调整了他们的膳食准备策略，有时在食欲不佳时优先考虑儿童的摄入量而不是营养价值；ii)癌症儿童的非正式照顾者在用餐时间使用一系列策略来支持营养摄入，从积极的鼓励和激励到更强制的策略；iii)癌症儿童的非正式照护者认为，儿童饮食行为的改变显著影响了照护者的幸福感和家庭动态；癌症儿童的非正式照顾者面临着由个人理解和外部支持系统形成的与喂养有关的困难。结论：本综述强调了护理人员在膳食准备和用餐时间使用的不同喂养策略。照顾者报告说，在管理孩子改变的饮食行为方面存在困难，比如个人层面的情绪困扰，以及家庭层面的共享膳食中断。还确定了多层次的促进因素和未满足的需求，包括难以理解孩子的经历和亲戚的支持，但获得量身定制的饮食指导的机会有限。因此，卫生保健提供者应提供实用的饮食建议和支持，以减轻照顾者的负担，同时促进儿童的营养健康。未来的研究应该探索儿童癌症诊断前后的喂养经历，以提供更全面的了解。评审注册号：PROSPERO CRD42024501382。

{"title":"Informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.","authors":"Donruedee Kamkhoad, Tippawan Srichalerm, Porawan Witwaranukool","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00221","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00221","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this review was to synthesize informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer.Introduction: Alterations in eating behaviors among children with cancer affect their nutritional status, resulting in various adverse consequences. Besides interventions provided by health care professionals, the role of informal caregivers, often parents, family members, or relatives, in supporting and maintaining adequate nutrition is equally important. Exploring informal caregivers' experiences of feeding their children can offer valuable insights for enhancing nutritional care.Eligibility criteria: This review included qualitative studies, as well as the qualitative components of mixed methods studies, examining the experiences of informal caregivers in feeding children 2 to 18 years of age with cancer. Caregivers of any gender or age were included. Studies published in English or Thai up to August 18, 2025, were considered.Methods: This review followed the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (BVS), ThaiJO (TCI), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest). No language restrictions were applied and no date limit was set. Reference lists of the included studies were searched for additional relevant studies. Two reviewers separately screened for eligible studies and performed the critical appraisal. Two reviewers extracted the data, and 3 reviewers conducted the synthesis using meta-aggregation and summarized the findings. The final synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach.Results: A total of 28 studies across 13 countries, spanning 6 continents, were included. There were 137 extracted findings (unequivocal=135, credible=2) with narrative illustrations. These findings were combined to form 19 categories based on similarity in meaning and 4 synthesized findings: i) Informal caregivers of children with cancer adapted their meal preparation strategies, at times prioritizing a child's intake over nutritional value when appetite is poor; ii) Informal caregivers of children with cancer used a spectrum of strategies during mealtimes to support nutritional intake, from positive encouragement and incentivization to more coercive tactics; iii) Informal caregivers of children with cancer perceived their children's altered eating behaviors as significantly affecting caregivers' well-being and family dynamics; and iv) Informal caregivers of children with cancer face feeding-related difficulties shaped by both personal understanding and external support systems.Conclusions: This review highlights the diverse feeding strategies used by caregivers during meal preparation and mealtimes. Caregivers reported difficulties in managing their children's altered eating ","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"611-666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13045812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Global characteristics of the use of complementary and alternative medicine for autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocol. 自闭症谱系障碍补充和替代医学使用的全球特征：范围审查方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00264

Georgia Mae Willcox, Dorothy Agnes Shead, Busisiwe Constance Maseko

Objectives: The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing information on the characteristics of the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as treatment for the signs and symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Introduction: ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by social-communication difficulties and restrictive, repetitive behaviors resulting from complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors, and associated with psychological and medical comorbidities. It is a global phenomenon with a detrimental impact on families. Supplemental to conventional treatments, caregivers can consider using CAM.

Eligibility criteria: Primary, secondary, and gray literature sources considering the use of CAM for treating the signs and symptoms of ASD in participants of any age will be included. Sources proposing the use of CAM for any condition other than ASD or discussing any therapy for ASD other than CAM will be excluded. Studies in all languages will be considered for inclusion, as will sources from the past decade.

Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in line with the JBI scoping review framework and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A primary search of PubMed to identify keywords and phrases will be followed by subsequent searches of Emcare (Ovid), Nursing and Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), Scopus, and Google Scholar. The titles, abstracts, and full texts of identified sources will be screened for relevancy by 2 reviewers independently, with conflicts adjudicated by a third reviewer. Findings will be discussed in a narrative summary and illustrated using figures, tables, and a gap map.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/c9j5n/overview.

目的：这一范围审查的目的是绘制关于使用补充或替代医学（CAM）作为治疗自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）体征和症状的特征的现有信息。简介：ASD是一种神经发育障碍，以社交困难和限制性、重复性行为为特征，是遗传和环境因素复杂相互作用的结果，并伴有心理和医学合并症。这是一种对家庭产生有害影响的全球现象。作为常规治疗的补充，护理人员可以考虑使用辅助辅助治疗。入选标准：将包括考虑使用CAM治疗ASD的主要、次要和灰色文献来源。建议将CAM用于除ASD以外的任何病症或讨论除CAM以外的任何ASD治疗的来源将被排除在外。所有语言的研究都将被纳入考虑范围，过去十年（2015-2025年）的研究也将纳入考虑范围。方法：该范围评价将按照JBI范围评价框架进行，并使用范围评价系统评价和荟萃分析扩展首选报告项目（PRISMA-ScR）进行报告。首先搜索PubMed以确定关键字和短语，随后搜索Emcare （Ovid）、Nursing and Allied Health Premium （ProQuest）、Scopus和谷歌Scholar。确定来源的标题、摘要和全文将由2名独立审稿人筛选相关性，冲突由第三名审稿人裁决。研究结果将以叙述性摘要的形式进行讨论，并使用图表、表格和差距图进行说明。评审注册：OSF https://osf.io/c9j5n/overview。

{"title":"Global characteristics of the use of complementary and alternative medicine for autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Georgia Mae Willcox, Dorothy Agnes Shead, Busisiwe Constance Maseko","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00264","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00264","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing information on the characteristics of the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as treatment for the signs and symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Introduction: ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by social-communication difficulties and restrictive, repetitive behaviors resulting from complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors, and associated with psychological and medical comorbidities. It is a global phenomenon with a detrimental impact on families. Supplemental to conventional treatments, caregivers can consider using CAM.Eligibility criteria: Primary, secondary, and gray literature sources considering the use of CAM for treating the signs and symptoms of ASD in participants of any age will be included. Sources proposing the use of CAM for any condition other than ASD or discussing any therapy for ASD other than CAM will be excluded. Studies in all languages will be considered for inclusion, as will sources from the past decade.Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in line with the JBI scoping review framework and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A primary search of PubMed to identify keywords and phrases will be followed by subsequent searches of Emcare (Ovid), Nursing and Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), Scopus, and Google Scholar. The titles, abstracts, and full texts of identified sources will be screened for relevancy by 2 reviewers independently, with conflicts adjudicated by a third reviewer. Findings will be discussed in a narrative summary and illustrated using figures, tables, and a gap map.Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/c9j5n/overview.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"806-813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Medical inpatient experiences and perceptions of discharge education provided by health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review protocol. 由卫生保健专业人员提供的医疗住院病人经验和出院教育的看法：一个定性的系统评价方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00169

Ariane Sabina Stieven, Sonia Hines, Romy Jia, Cindy Stern, Maria do Carmo Fernandez Lourenço Haddad

Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences and perceptions of adult medical inpatients regarding discharge education provided by health care professionals during their hospital stay, when patients are discharged from hospital to home.

Introduction: Discharge education is an essential part of patient care, helping individuals prepare to manage their health once they leave the hospital. Many patients face significant challenges in adjusting to life outside the hospital following discharge, and these challenges can provide valuable insights into their needs in terms of the discharge process.

Eligibility criteria: This review will consider qualitative studies exploring the perceptions and experiences of adult medical inpatients who received discharge education from health care professionals and were discharged from hospital to home. Studies published in English and Portuguese, regardless of publication date or geographic origin, will be eligible.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted across the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), LILACS (BVS), and ERIC (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global will be searched for gray literature. Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise studies and then extract data. For data synthesis, a meta-aggregative approach will be used. The ConQual approach will be employed for assessing the confidence in the evidence. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final systematic review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD420250641761.

目的：本综述的目的是综合成人住院患者在出院回家时，对医疗保健专业人员在其住院期间提供的出院教育的经验和看法。出院教育是病人护理的重要组成部分，帮助个人准备管理他们的健康，一旦他们离开医院。许多患者在出院后适应医院外的生活时面临着重大挑战，这些挑战可以为他们在出院过程中的需求提供有价值的见解。资格标准：本综述将考虑定性研究，探讨接受卫生保健专业人员出院教育并出院回家的成年住院患者的看法和经历。以英语和葡萄牙语发表的研究，无论出版日期或地理来源如何，都将符合条件。方法：本综述将遵循JBI方法对定性证据进行系统评价。全面的文献检索将在以下数据库进行：PubMed， CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), LILACS （BVS）和ERIC （EBSCOhost）。ProQuest dissertation & Theses Global将搜索灰色文献。两名审稿人将独立筛选和评估研究，然后提取数据。对于数据综合，将使用元聚合方法。将采用征服方法来评估证据的可信度。搜索结果和研究纳入过程将在最终的系统综述中完整报告，并在系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目流程图中展示。系统评价注册号：PROSPERO CRD420250641761 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/。

{"title":"Medical inpatient experiences and perceptions of discharge education provided by health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Ariane Sabina Stieven, Sonia Hines, Romy Jia, Cindy Stern, Maria do Carmo Fernandez Lourenço Haddad","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00169","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00169","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences and perceptions of adult medical inpatients regarding discharge education provided by health care professionals during their hospital stay, when patients are discharged from hospital to home.Introduction: Discharge education is an essential part of patient care, helping individuals prepare to manage their health once they leave the hospital. Many patients face significant challenges in adjusting to life outside the hospital following discharge, and these challenges can provide valuable insights into their needs in terms of the discharge process.Eligibility criteria: This review will consider qualitative studies exploring the perceptions and experiences of adult medical inpatients who received discharge education from health care professionals and were discharged from hospital to home. Studies published in English and Portuguese, regardless of publication date or geographic origin, will be eligible.Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted across the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), LILACS (BVS), and ERIC (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global will be searched for gray literature. Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise studies and then extract data. For data synthesis, a meta-aggregative approach will be used. The ConQual approach will be employed for assessing the confidence in the evidence. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final systematic review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.Review registration: PROSPERO CRD420250641761.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"791-797"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Integration of One Health competencies in medical curricula: a scoping review protocol. 将“一个健康”能力纳入医学课程：范围审查方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00147

Dian Puspita Sari, Yoga Pamungkas Susani, Gandes Retno Rahayu

Objective: This scoping review aims to map and characterize the integration of One Health competencies into medical curricula, along with the associated outcomes, challenges, and supporting factors.

Introduction: Equipping future health professionals with One Health competencies is crucial amid ongoing health threats at the human-animal-environment interface. Addressing these challenges requires multidisciplinary collaboration, yet medical education lags behind other fields in integrating One Health, limiting awareness and readiness for interprofessional work beyond the human health sector. The extent of One Health integration into medical curricula remains unevaluated.

Eligibility criteria: This scoping review will include both published and unpublished research, as well as non-research articles, that describe/evaluate courses, modules, or learning activities designed to develop One Health competencies within undergraduate or postgraduate medical curricula. These initiatives must engage medical students, residents, or both, either exclusively or alongside students from other disciplines. This review will include sources in any language from 2008 onward. Sources reporting continuing professional development, extracurricular activities, educational outcomes, implementation challenges, and supporting factors in general terms will be excluded.

Methods: This review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches will be conducted in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC (ProQuest), and SpringerLink, and will include gray literature sources, such as Google, Google Scholar, thesis repositories, and One Health University network websites. Two reviewers will independently screen sources and extract data following a pilot test for each stage. Analysis will include frequency counts, thematic analysis, competency mapping, and evidence synthesis using a logic model.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/gt3ru.

目的：本综述旨在绘制和描述将“一体健康”能力整合到医学课程中的过程，以及相关的结果、挑战和支持因素。在人类-动物-环境界面的持续健康威胁中，为未来的卫生专业人员配备“同一个健康”能力至关重要。应对这些挑战需要多学科合作，但医学教育在整合“同一健康”方面落后于其他领域，限制了对人类卫生部门以外跨专业工作的认识和准备。“同一个健康”纳入医学课程的程度仍未得到评估。资格标准：本次范围审查将包括已发表和未发表的研究，以及描述/评估本科或研究生医学课程中旨在培养“同一个健康”能力的课程、模块或学习活动的非研究文章。这些举措必须让医学生、住院医生或两者都参与进来，要么单独参与，要么与其他学科的学生一起参与。此审查将包括2008年以后的任何语言的来源。一般而言，关于持续专业发展、课外活动、教育成果、实施挑战和支持因素的来源将被排除在外。方法：本综述遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。检索将在PubMed（包括MEDLINE）、Scopus、Web of Science、ERIC （ProQuest）、SpringerLink中进行，并将包括灰色文献来源，如谷歌、谷歌Scholar、论文库和One Health University网络网站。两名审稿人将独立筛选来源并在每个阶段的试点测试后提取数据。分析将包括频率计数、专题分析、能力映射和使用逻辑模型的证据合成。评审注册：OSF https://osf.io/gt3ru。

{"title":"Integration of One Health competencies in medical curricula: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Dian Puspita Sari, Yoga Pamungkas Susani, Gandes Retno Rahayu","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00147","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00147","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This scoping review aims to map and characterize the integration of One Health competencies into medical curricula, along with the associated outcomes, challenges, and supporting factors.Introduction: Equipping future health professionals with One Health competencies is crucial amid ongoing health threats at the human-animal-environment interface. Addressing these challenges requires multidisciplinary collaboration, yet medical education lags behind other fields in integrating One Health, limiting awareness and readiness for interprofessional work beyond the human health sector. The extent of One Health integration into medical curricula remains unevaluated.Eligibility criteria: This scoping review will include both published and unpublished research, as well as non-research articles, that describe/evaluate courses, modules, or learning activities designed to develop One Health competencies within undergraduate or postgraduate medical curricula. These initiatives must engage medical students, residents, or both, either exclusively or alongside students from other disciplines. This review will include sources in any language from 2008 onward. Sources reporting continuing professional development, extracurricular activities, educational outcomes, implementation challenges, and supporting factors in general terms will be excluded.Methods: This review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches will be conducted in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC (ProQuest), and SpringerLink, and will include gray literature sources, such as Google, Google Scholar, thesis repositories, and One Health University network websites. Two reviewers will independently screen sources and extract data following a pilot test for each stage. Analysis will include frequency counts, thematic analysis, competency mapping, and evidence synthesis using a logic model.Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/gt3ru.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"763-772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Incidence and prevalence of atopic disease in second and subsequent generation immigrants from Asia in Australia: a systematic review protocol. 澳大利亚第二代及以后的亚洲移民特应性疾病的发病率和流行：一项系统回顾方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00571

Danielle Lee, Sonia Hines, Romy Menghao Jia

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the incidence and prevalence of atopic disease in second- and subsequent-generation immigrants from Asia in Australia.

Introduction: Atopic diseases are IgE-mediated hypersensitivity diseases that have increased significantly globally. Western countries have conspicuously more incidences of atopic disease than Eastern countries. An increase in second-generation immigrants in Australia has revealed an emerging disparity between the atopic profile of first-generation immigrants, second-generation immigrants, and non-immigrants. Second-generation immigrants from Asia are markedly more susceptible to atopic disease than non-immigrants and their first-generation parents.

Eligibility criteria: Studies including atopic disease, specifically food allergies, asthma, atopic dermatitis (eczema), and allergic rhinitis (hay fever), will be included; other presentations of atopic disease will be excluded. The population of interest will be second-generation Asian immigrants and any subsequent generations. Each paper's definition of Asian will be accepted as presented. The context of interest is Australia.

Methods: This systematic review will follow JBI methodology and the PERSyst manual for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase will be searched for English-language studies from 1990 to the present. Gray literature and trial registries will also be searched. Prevalence and incidence data will be screened against the eligibility criteria and critically appraised by 2 reviewers independently. Data such as age, sex, and country of origin will be extracted via a customized tool. The data will undergo meta-analysis and will be presented in narrative format with figures and tables where statistical pooling is not possible.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024612805.

目的：本系统综述的目的是分析来自亚洲的第二代及后代移民在澳大利亚的特应性疾病的发病率和患病率。引言：特应性疾病是ige介导的超敏性疾病，在全球范围内显著增加。西方国家的特应性疾病发病率明显高于东方国家。澳大利亚第二代移民的增加揭示了第一代移民、第二代移民和非移民之间的差异。来自亚洲的第二代移民似乎明显比非移民和他们的第一代父母更容易患特应性疾病。入选标准：研究包括特应性疾病，特别是食物过敏、哮喘、特应性皮炎（湿疹）和过敏性鼻炎（花粉热）；其他特应性疾病的介绍将被排除在外。感兴趣的人口将是第二代亚洲移民及其后代。每篇论文对亚洲人的定义将被接受。我们感兴趣的背景是澳大利亚。方法：本系统评价将遵循JBI方法学和persystem手册对患病率和发病率进行系统评价。PubMed, Scopus， CINAHL和Embase将检索1990年至今的英语研究。灰色文献和试验登记也将被检索。患病率和发病率数据将根据资格标准进行筛选，并由2名独立审稿人进行严格评价。年龄、性别和原籍国等数据将通过定制工具提取。数据将进行荟萃分析，并在无法进行统计汇总的情况下以数字和表格的叙述形式呈现。评审注册：PROSPERO CRD42024612805。

{"title":"Incidence and prevalence of atopic disease in second and subsequent generation immigrants from Asia in Australia: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Danielle Lee, Sonia Hines, Romy Menghao Jia","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00571","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00571","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the incidence and prevalence of atopic disease in second- and subsequent-generation immigrants from Asia in Australia.Introduction: Atopic diseases are IgE-mediated hypersensitivity diseases that have increased significantly globally. Western countries have conspicuously more incidences of atopic disease than Eastern countries. An increase in second-generation immigrants in Australia has revealed an emerging disparity between the atopic profile of first-generation immigrants, second-generation immigrants, and non-immigrants. Second-generation immigrants from Asia are markedly more susceptible to atopic disease than non-immigrants and their first-generation parents.Eligibility criteria: Studies including atopic disease, specifically food allergies, asthma, atopic dermatitis (eczema), and allergic rhinitis (hay fever), will be included; other presentations of atopic disease will be excluded. The population of interest will be second-generation Asian immigrants and any subsequent generations. Each paper's definition of Asian will be accepted as presented. The context of interest is Australia.Methods: This systematic review will follow JBI methodology and the PERSyst manual for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase will be searched for English-language studies from 1990 to the present. Gray literature and trial registries will also be searched. Prevalence and incidence data will be screened against the eligibility criteria and critically appraised by 2 reviewers independently. Data such as age, sex, and country of origin will be extracted via a customized tool. The data will undergo meta-analysis and will be presented in narrative format with figures and tables where statistical pooling is not possible.Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024612805.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"842-851"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Leveling the playing field: supporting authors from resource-limited settings to conduct and publish systematic reviews in JBI Evidence Synthesis. 公平竞争环境：支持资源有限的作者在JBI证据综合中进行和发表系统评价。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-26-00120

Hien Thi Ho, Tara Crandon, Sonia Hines, Mara Lambert, Melanie Dankel, Emilie May Francis, Edoardo Aromataris

引用次数: 0

Hospital-based rehabilitation for proximal hip fragility fractures in older adults: a scoping review protocol. 老年人髋近端脆性骨折的医院康复：一项范围审查方案

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis

Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00100

Hugo Fernandes, Inês Rodrigues, Elisabete Peixoto, Ricardo Salgado, Daniel Ferreira, Carmen Queirós

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to systematically organize and analyze the existing rehabilitation programs and exercises for inpatients, particularly older adults, with proximal hip fragility fractures, focusing on the characteristics and methods of exercise programs.

Introduction: Hip fractures are a leading cause of disability and long-term care needs among older adults, with rising incidence due to aging. Early and effective rehabilitation is essential, yet existing research often focuses on single interventions or specific aspects of rehabilitation. For inpatients who are 65 years or older, a comprehensive analysis of rehabilitation programs and exercise interventions is needed, in line with the FITT-VP framework and incorporating multidisciplinary involvement.

Eligibility criteria: This scoping review will include studies involving inpatients aged 65 years or older who have undergone surgical treatment for a single proximal hip fragility fracture and received inpatient rehabilitation in the same hospital. Studies must describe rehabilitation programs or exercise interventions.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Scopus, JBI EBP Database (Ovid), PEDro, and Epistemonikos, and fragility fracture-related websites. The search will be conducted from January 2015 to February 2025, with no language or country restrictions. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be charted and presented using the FITT-VP framework, with results in tabular and narrative format to highlight characteristics and trends.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/cysng/overview.

目的：本综述的目的是系统地整理和分析现有的髋近端脆性骨折住院患者，特别是老年人的康复方案和运动，重点是运动方案的特点和方法。这些知识将有助于更好地理解现有的证据基础，并为未来的研究提供信息。髋部骨折是老年人残疾和长期护理需求的主要原因，随着年龄的增长，发病率不断上升。早期和有效的康复是必不可少的，但现有的研究往往侧重于单一干预或康复的具体方面。对于65岁或以上的住院患者，需要对康复计划和运动干预进行综合分析，符合FITT-VP框架并结合多学科参与。入选标准：纳入年龄在65岁及以上，因单髋近端脆性骨折接受手术治疗并在同一家医院接受住院康复治疗的住院患者。研究必须描述康复计划或运动干预。方法：本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。检索的数据库包括PubMed、CINAHL Ultimate （EBSCOhost）、Embase、Web of Science Core Collection、Cochrane Library、Scopus、JBI EBP Database （Ovid）、PEDro和Epistemonikos，以及脆性骨折相关网站。搜索将从2015年1月持续到2025年2月，没有语言和国家限制。两名独立审稿人将筛选和提取数据，分歧由第三名审稿人解决。将使用FITT-VP框架将数据绘制成图表，并以表格和叙述形式呈现结果，以突出特征和趋势。评审注册：OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CYSNG。

{"title":"Hospital-based rehabilitation for proximal hip fragility fractures in older adults: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Hugo Fernandes, Inês Rodrigues, Elisabete Peixoto, Ricardo Salgado, Daniel Ferreira, Carmen Queirós","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00100","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00100","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to systematically organize and analyze the existing rehabilitation programs and exercises for inpatients, particularly older adults, with proximal hip fragility fractures, focusing on the characteristics and methods of exercise programs.Introduction: Hip fractures are a leading cause of disability and long-term care needs among older adults, with rising incidence due to aging. Early and effective rehabilitation is essential, yet existing research often focuses on single interventions or specific aspects of rehabilitation. For inpatients who are 65 years or older, a comprehensive analysis of rehabilitation programs and exercise interventions is needed, in line with the FITT-VP framework and incorporating multidisciplinary involvement.Eligibility criteria: This scoping review will include studies involving inpatients aged 65 years or older who have undergone surgical treatment for a single proximal hip fragility fracture and received inpatient rehabilitation in the same hospital. Studies must describe rehabilitation programs or exercise interventions.Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Scopus, JBI EBP Database (Ovid), PEDro, and Epistemonikos, and fragility fracture-related websites. The search will be conducted from January 2015 to February 2025, with no language or country restrictions. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be charted and presented using the FITT-VP framework, with results in tabular and narrative format to highlight characteristics and trends.Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/cysng/overview.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"780-790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145901219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0