Pub Date : 1989-07-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967280133
V. Kerimov
The name A. S. Khomiakov crops up in practically everything written on Slavophilism, especially when the discussion touches on sociophilosophical problems. But one thing here is odd. Most authors, in dealing with Khomiakov's analysis of universal history, touch barely in passing on his capital (and unfortunately incomplete) work Notes on Universal History [Zapiski o vsemirnoi istorii], although in volume it makes up almost half of his collected works. Although this text has been little studied, it is sometimes characterized very harshly. In the words of one scholar, Khomiakov attempted in it to "marshal the data of religion and linguistics on behalf of fanciful conceptions that, pathetically, amounted to only a few pet notions about the triumph of Slavic orthodoxy."1 After such an unequivocal assessment, is it worthwhile digging about in the old rubbish and wasting time? On first glance the volume of Khomiakov's Notes is indeed a peculiar work. The notes were made by the author for himself, and this has l...
{"title":"A. S. Khomiakov's Philosophy of History: From the Pages of a Half-Forgotten Work","authors":"V. Kerimov","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967280133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280133","url":null,"abstract":"The name A. S. Khomiakov crops up in practically everything written on Slavophilism, especially when the discussion touches on sociophilosophical problems. But one thing here is odd. Most authors, in dealing with Khomiakov's analysis of universal history, touch barely in passing on his capital (and unfortunately incomplete) work Notes on Universal History [Zapiski o vsemirnoi istorii], although in volume it makes up almost half of his collected works. Although this text has been little studied, it is sometimes characterized very harshly. In the words of one scholar, Khomiakov attempted in it to \"marshal the data of religion and linguistics on behalf of fanciful conceptions that, pathetically, amounted to only a few pet notions about the triumph of Slavic orthodoxy.\"1 After such an unequivocal assessment, is it worthwhile digging about in the old rubbish and wasting time? On first glance the volume of Khomiakov's Notes is indeed a peculiar work. The notes were made by the author for himself, and this has l...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"33-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280133","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-07-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-196728016
V. S. Bibler
In this article I should like briefly to ground two mutually determining propositions: 1. The philosophical logic that has emerged in the twentieth century and that corresponds to contemporary culture is a logic of paradox.
{"title":"On the Philosophical Logic of Paradox","authors":"V. S. Bibler","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-196728016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-196728016","url":null,"abstract":"In this article I should like briefly to ground two mutually determining propositions: 1. The philosophical logic that has emerged in the twentieth century and that corresponds to contemporary culture is a logic of paradox.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"6-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-196728016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-04-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967270425
B. Sokolov
Mikhail Bulgakov's novel The Master and Margarita was written between 1929 and 1940. Although delayed for a quarter of a century, it quickly found a stable place in our life as soon as it was published [for the first publication of the novel see: Moskva, 1966, no. 11; 1967, no. 1]. It is usually classified as a satirical philosophical novel. The satirical element puts it in the same family as such well-known works of the end of the '20s as the novels of I. Il'f and E. Petrov, Twelve Chairs [Dvenadtsat' stul'ev] and The Golden Calf [Zolotoi telenok], but its emphatically philosophical orientation makes it all but a unique phenomenon in the history of Soviet literature. The novel's philosophical aspects have already been examined in a number of essays. Thus, for example, N. P. Utekhin analyzes the reflection of certain general philosophical categories in the novel.1 G. Chernikova and I. L. Galinskaia have endeavored to determine the concrete literary sources of the novel's philosophy [Chernikova 1971, pp. 2...
米哈伊尔·布尔加科夫的小说《大师与玛格丽塔》写于1929年至1940年之间。虽然推迟了四分之一个世纪，但它一出版就迅速在我们的生活中找到了一个稳定的位置。11;1967年,没有。1]。它通常被归类为讽刺哲学小说。讽刺元素使它与20年代末的著名作品，如I. Il'f和E. Petrov的小说，《十二把椅子》(Dvenadtsat' stul'ev)和《金牛犊》(Zolotoi telenok)，属于同一家族，但其强调的哲学取向使其成为苏联文学史上独一无二的现象。这部小说的哲学方面已经在一些文章中进行了研究。因此，例如，n·p·乌捷欣分析了某些一般哲学范畴在小说中的反映G. Chernikova和I. L. Galinskaia努力确定小说哲学的具体文学来源[Chernikova 1971, pp. 2…]
{"title":"The Sources for Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita","authors":"B. Sokolov","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967270425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270425","url":null,"abstract":"Mikhail Bulgakov's novel The Master and Margarita was written between 1929 and 1940. Although delayed for a quarter of a century, it quickly found a stable place in our life as soon as it was published [for the first publication of the novel see: Moskva, 1966, no. 11; 1967, no. 1]. It is usually classified as a satirical philosophical novel. The satirical element puts it in the same family as such well-known works of the end of the '20s as the novels of I. Il'f and E. Petrov, Twelve Chairs [Dvenadtsat' stul'ev] and The Golden Calf [Zolotoi telenok], but its emphatically philosophical orientation makes it all but a unique phenomenon in the history of Soviet literature. The novel's philosophical aspects have already been examined in a number of essays. Thus, for example, N. P. Utekhin analyzes the reflection of certain general philosophical categories in the novel.1 G. Chernikova and I. L. Galinskaia have endeavored to determine the concrete literary sources of the novel's philosophy [Chernikova 1971, pp. 2...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270425","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-04-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967270449
M. Makarevich
I would say that it was not quite correct to call my talk a report. I can offer nothing new on this question beyond what was adopted at the Plenum of the Central Control Commission (CCC),2 has been printed in the newspapers, and is the opinion of the CCC.
{"title":"The Report of Comrade Sol'ts1 to the Cell Meeting of the Central Control Commission and the People's Commissariat of Workers' and Peasants' Inspection","authors":"M. Makarevich","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967270449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270449","url":null,"abstract":"I would say that it was not quite correct to call my talk a report. I can offer nothing new on this question beyond what was adopted at the Plenum of the Central Control Commission (CCC),2 has been printed in the newspapers, and is the opinion of the CCC.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"49-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270449","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-04-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967270446
M. Makarevich
The revolutionary restructuring of the whole of the life of our society, which got under way in the country after the April 1985 Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU, is inseparably bound up with a consolidation of the moral foundations of socialist society and the Soviet mode of life. A profound intellectual conviction, the greatest political and moral responsibility for the fate of the country, and an unwavering observance of the Leninist ethics of Bolshevism are the demands now being placed on all Soviet people, but with special urgency on Party members. A concern for the moral purity and honesty of Communists is the prime duty of a Party organization. The Party calls for a most merciless struggle against accommodators, careerists, and opportunists, and against protectionism, family favoritism, nepotism, and promotion of workers on the basis of hometownism and personal loyalty. Party organizations must apply the full rigor of the requirements of the Party statutes to those who compromise the nam...
{"title":"The Discussions of Party Ethics in the 1920s","authors":"M. Makarevich","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967270446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270446","url":null,"abstract":"The revolutionary restructuring of the whole of the life of our society, which got under way in the country after the April 1985 Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU, is inseparably bound up with a consolidation of the moral foundations of socialist society and the Soviet mode of life. A profound intellectual conviction, the greatest political and moral responsibility for the fate of the country, and an unwavering observance of the Leninist ethics of Bolshevism are the demands now being placed on all Soviet people, but with special urgency on Party members. A concern for the moral purity and honesty of Communists is the prime duty of a Party organization. The Party calls for a most merciless struggle against accommodators, careerists, and opportunists, and against protectionism, family favoritism, nepotism, and promotion of workers on the basis of hometownism and personal loyalty. Party organizations must apply the full rigor of the requirements of the Party statutes to those who compromise the nam...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"46-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270446","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-04-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967270465
R. V. Petropavlovskii
The restructuring of social relations which life has made necessary, the liberation from all anomalies and deformations and from everything that contradicts the foundations of the socialist order that accumulated in our country during the years of stagnation, and the orientation adopted by the Party toward a maximum utilization of social potential in the interests of all-around development have placed the question of restoring the moral health of society among the key and top-priority problems we have to face. The Party slogan "Begin with yourself points up the fact that a quite exclusive function is reserved for Party morals and Party ethics in the processes of restructuring: to purge the Party and society of all that is polluted; to achieve a moral reputation for the Party member that is always pure and honest; to implant the spirit of Leninism in all its fullness among the Party ranks; to impart a Leninist style to the activity, the conduct, and the very life of Party members; in other words, to genuin...
{"title":"Party Ethics from the 1920s to the Present","authors":"R. V. Petropavlovskii","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967270465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270465","url":null,"abstract":"The restructuring of social relations which life has made necessary, the liberation from all anomalies and deformations and from everything that contradicts the foundations of the socialist order that accumulated in our country during the years of stagnation, and the orientation adopted by the Party toward a maximum utilization of social potential in the interests of all-around development have placed the question of restoring the moral health of society among the key and top-priority problems we have to face. The Party slogan \"Begin with yourself points up the fact that a quite exclusive function is reserved for Party morals and Party ethics in the processes of restructuring: to purge the Party and society of all that is polluted; to achieve a moral reputation for the Party member that is always pure and honest; to implant the spirit of Leninism in all its fullness among the Party ranks; to impart a Leninist style to the activity, the conduct, and the very life of Party members; in other words, to genuin...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"65-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967270465","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-01-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967280317
V. Solov'ev
Gentlemen! In inviting you to the free pursuit of philosophy, I should like first of all to reply to one question that may arise on this account. This question would be easy to dismiss as excessively naive, one that could only come from someone totally unfamiliar with philosophy. But since I have in mind mainly people who are as yet unfamiliar with philosophy, who have only just come to it, I cannot be so dismissive of this naive question, but rather deem it better to answer it.
{"title":"The Historical Tasks of Philosophy","authors":"V. Solov'ev","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967280317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280317","url":null,"abstract":"Gentlemen! In inviting you to the free pursuit of philosophy, I should like first of all to reply to one question that may arise on this account. This question would be easy to dismiss as excessively naive, one that could only come from someone totally unfamiliar with philosophy. But since I have in mind mainly people who are as yet unfamiliar with philosophy, who have only just come to it, I cannot be so dismissive of this naive question, but rather deem it better to answer it.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280317","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-01-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967280361
G. Shpet
Theater is an art or theater is not an independent art. Each of these antithetical propositions has its supporters. It is usually the supporters of the second who come up with anything resembling intelligible argumentation. The first is usually accepted as fact, sanctified by universal acknowledgement, without criticism, without much reflection—it is just accepted: theater unquestionably gives satisfaction. What kind? Aesthetic! And so, theater is an art!
{"title":"Theater as Art","authors":"G. Shpet","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967280361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280361","url":null,"abstract":"Theater is an art or theater is not an independent art. Each of these antithetical propositions has its supporters. It is usually the supporters of the second who come up with anything resembling intelligible argumentation. The first is usually accepted as fact, sanctified by universal acknowledgement, without criticism, without much reflection—it is just accepted: theater unquestionably gives satisfaction. What kind? Aesthetic! And so, theater is an art!","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"61-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280361","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-01-01DOI: 10.2753/SOR1061-0154280151
R. Blium
The immediate motive occasioning this letter was the worker E. Kopanitsyn's letter to the newspaper Izvestiia (December 8, 1986) in which he eloquently recounts his difficulties with a new machine manufactured in a factory in the city of Cheliabinsk. After telling what effort it had cost him to get this machine going, Kopanitsyn in a fit of temper exclaims: "I am completely unable to understand one simple thing: How could such a machine come into being at all? The hands of many workers touched it, except that these were not working hands. Can it really be true that no one, not a single person, was aroused enough to say: Just what are we doing here, brothers?"
{"title":"Alienation and Socialism","authors":"R. Blium","doi":"10.2753/SOR1061-0154280151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/SOR1061-0154280151","url":null,"abstract":"The immediate motive occasioning this letter was the worker E. Kopanitsyn's letter to the newspaper Izvestiia (December 8, 1986) in which he eloquently recounts his difficulties with a new machine manufactured in a factory in the city of Cheliabinsk. After telling what effort it had cost him to get this machine going, Kopanitsyn in a fit of temper exclaims: \"I am completely unable to understand one simple thing: How could such a machine come into being at all? The hands of many workers touched it, except that these were not working hands. Can it really be true that no one, not a single person, was aroused enough to say: Just what are we doing here, brothers?\"","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/SOR1061-0154280151","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69597078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-01-01DOI: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967280352
E. Pasternak, V. Kachalov
Among the many names violently consigned to oblivion, one cannot omit mentioning the name of Gustav Gustavovich Shpet, a scholar who made a substantial contribution to our country's philosophy, psychology, aesthetics, and linguistics. His rehabilitation in 1956 was not enough to restore his memory in public consciousness, paralyzed by the inertia and fears of the Stalinist years, and the freeze that began soon after, of the sprouts that had just been summoned to life, had its impact in an abrogation of agreements, cessation of publications, and in a number of cases removal of references to the philosopher. And the further thirty years of oblivion that followed were one more period of unjust punishment and a new ordeal in the terrible fate of the scholar and his ideas. His writings, which should have been a new word in science, should have given direction to further investigations, became effectively inaccessible to subsequent generations. References to Shpet in the works of Viach. Vs. Ivanov, Iu. M. Lotma...
{"title":"In Memory of Gustav Gustavovich Shpet","authors":"E. Pasternak, V. Kachalov","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967280352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280352","url":null,"abstract":"Among the many names violently consigned to oblivion, one cannot omit mentioning the name of Gustav Gustavovich Shpet, a scholar who made a substantial contribution to our country's philosophy, psychology, aesthetics, and linguistics. His rehabilitation in 1956 was not enough to restore his memory in public consciousness, paralyzed by the inertia and fears of the Stalinist years, and the freeze that began soon after, of the sprouts that had just been summoned to life, had its impact in an abrogation of agreements, cessation of publications, and in a number of cases removal of references to the philosopher. And the further thirty years of oblivion that followed were one more period of unjust punishment and a new ordeal in the terrible fate of the scholar and his ideas. His writings, which should have been a new word in science, should have given direction to further investigations, became effectively inaccessible to subsequent generations. References to Shpet in the works of Viach. Vs. Ivanov, Iu. M. Lotma...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":"52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967280352","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69534213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：